Matt Wong joined Molly Knight to discuss the COVID-19 Omnibus (Emergency Measures) and Other Acts Amendment Bill 2020. Matt analysed the Bill and what it means for Victorians.



Matt has had a very interesting range of careers. He started as a pilot before moving on to own a medical clinic. He studied law twice (under grad and post grad) but disliked it so switched to business and obtained an MBA. He has started and sold many companies, worked for corporates in robotics and A.I. and more recently started making content in an effort to be helpful to others every day.

Click on the image below to watch the full interview:


The full transcript follows  – E&OE :

Molly Knight 0:02
Hello, everyone, welcome to Health Australia Party. I’m Molly. Tonight we’ve got a really interesting talk about the omnibus bill, Victoria. And tonight we’re talking with Matt Wong. Now, Matt’s a very interesting character. I don’t know too many people who’ve studied law twice because they wanted to, but he has. He started off as a trainee. pilot, then moved into law. And then, for whatever reasons, didn’t like that. And then he switched and went into business and did his MBA. So he’s got a really varied and interesting career. And a lot of knowledge comes with all that learning and experience. So welcome, Matt, thank you so much for joining us tonight.

Matt Wong 0:52
Thank you, Molly. Hello to everyone.

Molly Knight 0:56
So tonight, Matt, we want I want to talk to you about Victoria. Wonderful, Victoria.

Matt Wong 1:03
sad story.

Molly Knight 1:04
It’s a very sad story. But it you know, this covid virus obviously loves Victoria, because it’s the only state that has such draconian measures in place. So around the world, as far as I know, nobody, nobody is shut down, like Victoria is, and they’re trying to even enforce it more. With an omnibus bill, can you please tell me what an omnibus bill is?

Matt Wong 1:33
It’s a very common thing where we need to make a lot of small changes to an act. So an act is just a piece of legislation, a law, and a bill is a baby act, once it gets voted into law, it becomes an act. So when we have to edit a lot of acts at the same time we pass an omnibus bill. Now, the problem with this omnibus bill, of course, is that it’s much as a whole bunch of little things. It’s a whole bunch of little things plus sneaky little, little insertion at the end there.

Molly Knight 2:02
Yeah, yeah, it’s um, it covers quite a few areas doesn’t have government, the juvenile area, the health area. Yeah. And what so in this bill, what do you think are the most important points that Victorians need to one be aware of? And to do something about what are the points that need to be stressed to the people that this is taking away so much more of their freedoms? I believe, I believe anyway, that’s what’s happening.

Matt Wong 2:38
Do you want me to jump straight to the horrors of it?

Molly Knight 2:41
Yes, please, Matt. As bad as it can get jumping.

Matt Wong 2:45
You’re not you’re not alone in thinking that you’re in good company, former Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia, Justice McHugh, a number of distinguished q C’s have all come out today, twice, actually, today, they came out and a different lot came out a couple of days ago, writing an open letter. What we’re looking at now is the most authoritarian laws that we have ever seen in Australia that are more akin to a despotic society, which we would never have dreamed could come to Australia. So I guess if we cut right to the point, we are looking at a bill that is going to allow the Department of Health and Human Services to appoint anybody to become a delegated authorized officer to exercise the emergency powers which are contained in Section 200 of our public health and well being act. And that’s things like locking us down. The scary part is not so much that they’re going to exercise these powers for further six months. It’s that anyone is going to be able to do it that they appoint even with no qualifications, and they’re going to be do they’re going to be able to detain us before we commit crimes. So we’re entering into a world of pre crime enforcement similar to Minority Report, the movie with Tom Cruise.

Molly Knight 4:02
Hmm. That doesn’t really make sense unless suddenly all these people are great psychics and can predict what crimes coming?

Matt Wong 4:10
Well, it seems odd that you would put very tricky and discretionary powers into the most untrained, I mean, at the moment, we’re seeing big poll, Victoria, please do some things that are they’re making a lot of mistakes. And even if it’s a minority of they’re very well trained force, they’re a very well trained force. And so to think we are now going to put even further discretion in powers into the hands of VSOs public service public safety officers I think they call or even public servants, and this is not an exaggeration. In the front of the bill. There’s an explanatory memorandum, and it literally says that they want to put this power into the hands of public servants.

Molly Knight 4:53
just doesn’t make any sense to me. None of this in Victoria is making any sense

Matt Wong 5:00
Well, a lot of us are trying to figure out why. And there are theories You know, there’s there’s the the more fringe I guess, I feels mean when I say fringe I don’t mean that in a bad way. But I guess there’s less of them on the on the on the right, far right, who would say, Oh, he’s, he’s evil he wants to sell us to try and he’s trying to take over the country and make us into a gulags like Nazi Germany. And you’ve got the other side on the left who are irrationally saying, I stand with Dan. He can do no wrong. I sit somewhere in the middle, I really think that he’s unfortunately destroying our state in many ways. And it’s not just my opinion. It’s the deputy Lord Mayor of Melbourne, who interviewed a couple of days ago. It’s Jim Penman from Jim’s mowing, who was in this room yesterday, it’s these people who are on the front line who are telling me how a state is being destroyed. Not just economically, I’ve had the COVID doctors in here in this room, the ones who originally wrote that letter, the original 12 or 13. And they’ve been telling me We are destroying this state, we are destroying the health of this state because of the increased deaths and so on that were causing mental health harms. I’ve even had the today I interviewed Sanjeev subblock. He’s the economist who resigned in protest from the Treasury and finance. And he’s saying we are killing people. So we’re doing a very bad thing down here, but I believe that Dan is trying to save us. I think he’s, I think he’s on a crusade. And I think he’s trying to save the state. And unfortunately, he’s destroying the state. And that’s the only thing I can think that can explain the craziness, the absurdity of it and why he doubles down and triples down on some of his policies.

Molly Knight 6:40
But Matt, what is it he’s trying to save Victoria from

Matt Wong 6:44
the Coronavirus that’s going to kill us all.

Molly Knight 6:48
That’s proven to be no worse than normal flu. But in fact, cancer death rate, heart disease, regular influenza deaths are all down because COVID numbers are up. So there’s something quite corrupt in that to start with.

Matt Wong 7:06
I didn’t come on here to hear a lot of reason, Molly, get out of here with your facts and your

Molly Knight 7:12
Oh, sorry, sorry, sorry, has to be off me. Yes. Why? What is it the savings from because you cannot even if this is a true new virus, you can’t protect people from viruses. They are everywhere. They’re on my glasses in my hair on my little headband. There. I’m breathing them, they are everywhere. So no matter how much you locked down people, you cannot stop this.

Matt Wong 7:41
The viruses aren’t all bad either. I mean, from a biological evolutionary biology perspective, they are part of if you believe in it, they’re part of the evolution of the human species. But look, I think he’s there’s another theory as well, which is more rational, perhaps, than even my theory, and that is from political insiders who have told me that he’s simply too deep. He’s He’s so deep, he can’t turn around and admit fault.

Molly Knight 8:06

Yeah. So he would, yeah, he just can’t admit that he’s gotten it wrong. And step back from it?

Matt Wong 8:15
Well, I can give you some interesting things, right. So there’s three things big pole, so I have contact inside, not inside contact, who has contacts inside big pole. And they currently doing exercises with ADF here in Melbourne. And they are saying that the that the morale and big pole is the lowest it’s ever been in a generate in a in a big pole generation. So in 1015 years of recruits, the ATF saying they are not enjoying working with Vic Paul, so much so that you’ve seen some videos where there’s one in particular where there’s an ADF member in a big poll harassing a lady for sitting down pregnant on a park bench, and the ADF member turns away from the camera and just kicks you right away from it. I think it’s becoming toxic. They’re losing their social license here in Victoria. So that’s the first signal the Treasury, the economist from the Department of Treasury and finance. They told me that almost unanimously, every single economist within Treasury and finance in Victoria agrees with his views, which is anti lockdown, and we’re killing people. And he resigned in protest. And he’s been in the news everywhere. Yes, he thinks there’s one, maybe two out of the 100 economists within our department, that a pro what Dan’s doing, and that our treasury department is advising Dan to do things differently and is frustrated that they that Dan is our premier is ignoring the advice being given to him.

Molly Knight 9:38
I mean, just doesn’t make sense. So his advice, he’s ignoring health advice, he’s ignoring advice on the economy. There has to be a reason apart from his ego. Apart from him thinking he’ll look stupid if he winds it back. I don’t know. I don’t know about the conspiracies. Going around, but something is very wrong here.

Matt Wong 10:04
something is very wrong. But I’m encouraged that if you think about more women we can start at a style was quite and get more complex from there. But the style was quick does it best when it says this is how democracy dies to thunderous applause. And it really sums up a lot of philosophical thought in that we don’t see dictatorships arise in, in protest, you always see them arise with the consent of the people. So the fact that Victoria is turning, we are seeing q C’s come out now. Businesses come out. So many people are coming up now, even the left wing media returning. I have great hope for Victoria. Because if they’re, if they’re waking up, then I don’t think we’re going to go full dictator then.

Molly Knight 10:47
Okay, well, that would be yes, that would be wonderful. Now, in this bill, and I was having a look at it earlier today. There seems to be and the media have definitely focused on this a little bit, that these people if this bill gets through the upper house, or the Legislative Council that he’s in Victoria isn’t up yet. So if it gets past it, these people with these new powers can detain children, I mean, they could be removed.

Matt Wong 11:18
No, no, no, calm down, everyone. Calm down.

I go great pains to make sure that you know my all of my content, I shouldn’t you found me through that video I made is accurate. The reason why I didn’t bring up the children is is causing a lot of fear, my inbox is flooded with moms afraid that the children are going away. Yeah, the power to remove children has always been there. And it’s generally what’s intended to be used in the case of delinquent parents, and so on. Right, we know that it’s always rested with the courts. So the courts have the ability to make those orders and family reunification orders and so on. Now, in the bill, it does make changes to some of those acts and the ability to extend family reunification, orders, and so on. However, it does not centralize power into the hands of the executive branch of government into the authorized officers or the police. It’s still specifically says that the courts can, and let me say something about the courts, we must have some faith in our courts in Victoria, you have to understand what’s happening here is 100%, not the fault of the courts, the courts have not been allowed to speak. So we have a separation of powers, you know, judiciary, executive and legislative people who make the laws, people who enforce the laws, the police and people who judge whether we’ve broken the law or not. So at the moment, every single COVID fire, not a single one has made it through to the courts yet this is our attorney general admitting this in the parliamentary accounts and estimates committee. Now one of the theories is that they don’t want it to get to the courts. Now putting the theory aside. It’s true that the laws are not being tested, because they’re not getting to the courts. So the judiciary, the judges, the courts have not been able to speak so we should not be angry at them. In fact, I’m hopeful that the most left wing state in Australia, the most progressive lenient, judges in Australia are here. So I’m hopeful that when it does get to the courts, we’ll finally get to see them play their hand and I suspect they are going to throw out quite a lot.

Molly Knight 13:18
Huh? Yeah. Okay. Yes, I guess, if you look at a bigger picture, overall, most people have a lot of common sense, don’t they?

Matt Wong 13:27
Especially on judiciary? Yes. I know. We have some weird stuff happening in the courts. But on the whole, they’re very good, huh?

Molly Knight 13:40
We’ve gone Sorry, sorry, people. I don’t know if anyone can see me or Oh, we just went. We just went blank. Sorry, everybody. I don’t know what’s happening. Some of my emails have been disappearing and all sorts of funny things happening. Anyway. Okay, so yes, so most, most people do have common sense and understand that this perhaps, has been handled in a very interesting manner. But with this omnibus bill, you know, this is pasture lower house. So that means there’s a lot of politicians who are saying, yep, let’s go for these changes.

Matt Wong 14:22
Okay, so this is an interesting story. We have it passed in low house because then Andrew is Labour government. Victoria has a massive majority in you know, low house. And so everything passes. However, I’ve just been told about 10 minutes ago before I jumped on with you, from someone who works in Spring Street in, in politics down here. That’s many of the MP The Labour MPs who are voting for it don’t want to now it makes sense that they have to have to follow party lines. They don’t like it. And a lot of them have supported the tilt at Dan’s leadership last week, where Tim palace was the front runner he did the numbers didn’t get the numbers. And so that’s why we started Coming up standing supporting Dan, this happens with every challenge happened, Turnbull. And Peter Dutton. It always happens, they do a first round, they don’t get the numbers and they come out and support them. So that’s first of all. And I’ve been given a name of one day to chase down because they really don’t like what Dan’s doing, see if I can interview them. So that’s good news. Now, Samantha, the greens have come out saying they don’t support this bill, because it’s bad, and it’s scary, and it’s arbitrary, and they will vote against it in the upper house. However, don’t forget everyone, those hypocrites called the greens voted for it in the low house. So there you go. Good news, though. The crossbenches. So this is where it will fail. Hopefully, in the upper house, it’s going to get there in the beginning to the middle of October. So we have a couple of weeks to three weeks. Yeah. And we lost the state of emergency fight by one vote, just 2119 on the measures that mattered. So if one flipped to would have been 2020, so fails, and has to win by a majority. So the upper house we’ve already had Fiona pattern who voted for the state of emergency she’s come out publican says she won’t support this bill in its current form. So I think just by that we’ve won the greens have said that they won’t support it in the house either. And that gives me hope that it won’t pass. But that said, this is the most serious thing I’ve seen in my family in my 30s. So maybe that doesn’t hold much weight. But other older people have said it’s the most serious change to what they’ve seen in their lifetimes. You see, yeah, on LinkedIn, the lawyers are out there saying it. So we need to fight.

Molly Knight 16:36
So what how do people do that? How does the public actually see what’s happening? And how do they get their voice? Heard?

Matt Wong 16:46
See what’s happening? Do you mean by like, well, we’re explaining

Molly Knight 16:50
Yeah, yeah, with with this bill, they, I mean, I’m absolutely amazed at the compliance of Victorians, with everything that’s been happening, I just, I don’t understand how they sit back. And maybe they’re only seeing the news on CHANNEL SEVEN, or nine or whatever. And they’re not really looking deeper at what’s going on, but to be singled out as a state with such severe restrictions. When all around the world the information is changing about how this virus is affecting people and the severity of it. We know it’s no worse than a flu. Why are they so compliancy? I don’t understand that. And so will they just be compliant with this bill? Will they sit back and say yes, Dan, come on, bring it on. Why are they jumping up and down? And if they want to jump up and down? How do they jump up and down? What do they do? Well, first of

Matt Wong 17:49
all, we have been squashed. If you look at the protest numbers around different cities in support of Victoria, you’ve had in Brisbane, I can’t remember what you had 1000 people or something out there. Sydney, you sorted Olympic Park a couple of weeks. So you had a lot. And the number of people who were intending to protest and he was very large. We had a Facebook group. We just Melbourne there was a Facebook group with over 115,000 members in it. 20,000 odd said that, yes, they’re going to the events, even if a quarter showed up, or a fifth showed up. We’re talking about a couple thousand people in protest. But we’ve had some of the most extreme draconian enforcement’s by police. You know, I did a video of the Queen Victoria markets was there that day buying food. I couldn’t believe what I saw. We are being scared into not I mean, we’ve had protests now every week since then of hundred people. So it’s obvious to me that even statistically speaking, it’s the curfews it’s the five kilometer limit. It’s the arresting for posting things on Facebook, see intimidation. It’s normal people like myself have DK phones now, in case we get raided by the police. It’s a joke. So first of all, I think that there is a resistance is just that we’re being squashed. What can we do? Well, mass civil disobedience would work. However, I would never suggest illegalities. I can’t I don’t want to be right about big poll. I don’t think we have I don’t think Victorians have the stomach for it. I think like you say we roll over. And we just allow the government to do what they like. So the only thing we can do is fight within the system. And that’s what they do. For example, with my friend Monica. She runs that page, reignite democracy Australia. It’s a respectful page where they do campaigns to email MPs and so on. I know you guys have something you have a tool where you can put in your address or something and it’ll tell you who your MPs are, so you can get their email address or whatever. So contacting the Labour MPs is key because a lot of them are dissatisfied with what’s going on.

Molly Knight 19:49
Yeah, that’s good to know. Because you don’t sort of hear that out there. So that’s really good information.

Matt Wong 19:55
I wouldn’t bother contacting the liberals. If I interview them in this room. I talked to I wouldn’t bother they’re all on board don’t waste their time. They’re all voting against, I wouldn’t bother contacting David limbrick from the Liberal Democrats or Tim quilty, they’re all, they’re all voting against it. It’s the labour people, we really need to convince them this coup to happen. We need, we need them to, we needed that coup to win, you know, the the Tim palace Leadership Challenge, something like that would be very, very good wouldn’t solve the problem, what labour would still be in, but they would be forced to make significant changes to their policy to justify the coup, that is a win. But other than that, we have to wake up is more important. We need to open our eyes and see what’s happening in front of us. And this goes for other states as well. You have to understand that governments, it’s not about what’s legal to bet what they can get away with. And we even had Dan Andrews today saying that the reason he locked down those towers was not because of powers under the public health and well being accidentally been seen. Now he’s claiming that they simply secure our quote, secured the site as the landlords of the government towers. So now he’s saying that as the landlords he used v. Paul to secure it in what would amount to a tort illegal tort of false imprisonment. So it’s all over the place, but he gets away with it. So please don’t allow other states, your states to get away with it because they Polly’s will look to Victoria. And they’ll see if the people of Victoria put up with it, then maybe the people of let’s say, who will put up with forced vaccinations, which is exactly what’s written into their Public Health Act, as in they can tie you down and inject you with what could be a perfectly safe vaccine? I don’t know. I’m not a doctor, but I’m just telling you, it’s in the Public Health Act.

Molly Knight 21:36
Hmm. Yeah, that’s, that’s enormously scary, because we don’t know what’s in it. And there’s a lot of information about vaccination programs around the world that have gone belly up very seriously. So yeah, when we don’t know. You know, we don’t have true choice. Oh, we can. I

Matt Wong 21:54
cannot Sorry to interrupt. Can I just emphasize to, you got to understand who this is coming from. I’m telling you to be careful of the vaccination thing and why I’m a fan of vaccinations. I’m vaccinated. My kids are vaccinated. So if I’m telling you to be careful, and holy hell, there’s something going wrong,

Molly Knight 22:10
huh? Yeah. Look, a lot of people that are very well, they’re, they’re vaccinated. They don’t they they believe in vaccines. And they’re saying, I don’t know about this vaccine because it’s so rushed. No way. Yeah, no, no, I think I don’t think many people will be silly enough to take something that’s not being well trialed, and so on. Yeah, I guess for me, I’m in New South Wales. So I look at it and I think okay, so if Victoria rolls on all of this, where does that leave the rest of Australia? Because if, yeah, Queensland wha they can certainly follow suit quite quickly. And then we’ve got the other states that I guess they may like the control or whatever it is, I don’t know what’s in these minds of these people. But we have to all of Australia needs to be aware of what’s going on. And, you know, talk talk to your members of parliament. You’re right. Just Just contact them. Matt, can we just backtrack a little bit? Are you able to tell them? just discuss a little bit because I know you know quite a bit about this. What is actually in this bill? What are the other? The forced vaccination is one of it.

Matt Wong 23:29
Oh, that’s not in this bill. That’s in WA’s.

Molly Knight 23:33
WA’s health bill? Yeah. Health?

Matt Wong 23:35
I think it’s in the current act. Yeah. We don’t have anything like that in Victoria.

Molly Knight 23:40
So what what’s in this omnibus bill, what what is actually in it?

Matt Wong 23:46
So I’m just pulling it up in front of me now. So what did you want to know about the the good, there’s a whole lot of good stuff, as you don’t know about that. Just, you know, the ability for courts to conduct things via zoom and all of that, you know, that’s all fine. The bad stuff you wanted to know about?

Molly Knight 24:01
I see. Well, that’s the stuff that scares people, but the stuff that takes away their freedoms and their rights as a human being. So yeah, let’s have a look at that.

Matt Wong 24:11
Just cut me off. If I’m I don’t know how long I’ve got to ask how long we’re interviewing for. So I don’t want to keep you too long. I’ve got plenty of time. But if you look at lay it all out. Okay. So if you look at the bill, which you can get from where would you get it from? I think it’s at Au, and it is called the covid 19 Omnibus emergency measures and other acts Amendment Bill 2020. It’s only 45 pages long and half of that is the explanatory memorandum, which I said was at the front of the bill. If you go down to page a COVID-19, temporary measures, which is down sort of thing, page 11 ish. Here we’re talking about for example, section 250 of the bill which is intending to add Section 30 into the act. So a new section 30. subsection one is going to say that the Secretary so the secretary of the HHS, by instrument, this is important. instrument means just a piece of paper that they sign. So in our country, we have x and then we have regulations, regulations are not voted on. And then legislative instruments which sit below, which is literally just a letter that someone signs. So the secretary by instrument may appoint any of the following to be an authorized officer. So these are the people who can exercise the emergency powers. This is the condition, a person the secretary considers appropriate for appointment based on the person’s skills, abilities, experience, or otherwise. And you know what other qualifications are listed or as required, it’s none. That’s it. So just the Secretary has to consider that they’re appropriate for appointment based on skills, attributes, experience or otherwise. Now, they said this is this is not an exaggeration. In the explanatory memorandum, if you scroll up to the top of that bill, it literally says that this new section 30, subsection one is intended to enable the HHS to appoint public servants to exercise these powers. If you think about these powers, we’re talking about significant powers, which are found in Section 200 of the public health and wellbeing act. They’re things like detaining people, and so on. Now, that is scary, because at the moment, we’re seeing big poll make a lot of errors, and they’re highly trained. We’re talking about people who are untrained, how many errors are they gonna make, but it goes on, there are more bad things that are sneaking in through this on the bus. We already have section 192 of the public health mobbing Act, which is allows people to assist anyone who’s exercising emergency powers to anyone, there’s no qualification on that. So if the law says currently now, if a let’s say a police officer is trying to detain someone under emergency powers, any other citizen any other human in here in this state can assist that officer. So the ability to recruit others. So now we’re talking about a public servant coming to your door with the help of I don’t know your neighbor, exercising some of these powers. Now, that’s scary enough, section 200 pounds is scary enough, they want to introduce a new section, this is called further emergency powers. This is a new section called section 200. A for apple. Further emergency powers say that a designated authorized officer which is now public servants, or whoever they want, may detain a person under Section 200. Which of those powers if a direction has been given in the exercise of emergency power, so just give a direction. And this is the key. The designated authorized officer reasonably believes that a person who is required to comply is a high risk person and is likely to refuse or fail to comply. So it’s saying that the officer has to make a prediction now that you are likely to refuse or failed to comply. And if you are likely to refuse or fail to comply, maybe someone like me, who’s on a podcast with Health Australia Party is likely or a fuse. I don’t know. It’s in the minds of that public servant, he comes to my door. They can detain me.

Molly Knight 28:17
So what does that mean when they detain you? Where do you go?

Matt Wong 28:21
It’s detainment and forcible removal. So they can put you in a facility like hotel quarantine. And to be fair to the government, they are saying that, look, there are some people with mental health issues or some people are so out there in terms of repeated offenses against the code of directions that they’re very high risk and likely to, to to disobey these orders. So we have to preemptively lock them up. Now, I don’t I mean, that’s ridiculous. That’s such a abrogation of liberties. But that’s what the government is saying. And I understand why they’re saying that. Yeah. And so detainment, okay, there is no limit. So there is no recourse to the courts, either. This is the huge thing. Usually when you detain someone, they can call them the courts to complain. There’s nothing left, perhaps maybe for the legal nerds out there. They could issue writs of habeas corpus, which is, you know, you can look that up, but it’s very unlikely. Overall, you’re stuck in there as long as the the authorised officer or the department does this to you. But keep in mind, there were the two conditions, right, they had to believe that you’re likely to disobey and you had to be a high risk person. And this bill defines a high risk person as someone with COVID-19 positive test results, or has had close contact with someone who has had a positive COVID-19 test result. So the effect of this bill is going to make tests go down. I mean, you think why the hell am I going to get tested for COVID-19 now and become a virus person?

Molly Knight 29:48
Yeah, exactly.

Matt Wong 29:49
I’m not gonna get tested. Why would I?

Molly Knight 29:51
Yeah, no, you wouldn’t, you wouldn’t put you at a higher risk.

Matt Wong 29:57
So that’s it. I mean, That’s the powers and and that’s what I can do. So overall, it’s pre emptive. Pre crime, it’s like minority report that the movement is it’s pre emptive detention based on a loosened standard of just predicting someone. And that prediction is now coming from a very diffuse and diverse, untrained, potentially untrained population.

Molly Knight 30:25
Hmm, yeah, it could be anyone could know. I mean, I don’t know. I just I don’t get it. I seriously don’t understand how any politician can say this is okay. No matter how deep a hole is dug for themselves. It just makes no sense.

Matt Wong 30:46
Well, look, I think it does if if

Can I read a quote to his place of you? Do you know CS Lewis? Well, he wrote nonie sorry. Oh, CS Lewis.

Molly Knight 31:01
Yep. Yep. Yeah.

Unknown Speaker 31:02
He’s written a lot of things besides Narnia. But just a short quote, which kind of sums it up. He says, All tyrannies a tyranny sincerely exercise for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive, it would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. Because the robber barons cruelty may sometimes sleep he’s cupidity or greed May at some point be satiated. But those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience. And I think this is the big problem we’re facing and Victoria those who are for Dan for the lockdowns and for Dan and his friends, they truly believe they’re doing the right thing. And there’s no end to the destruction they’re causing because they’re doing it with the approval of their own conscience. And that is why lately I’ve been fighting by interviewing people, and publicizing them who who are focusing on the on the conscience side of things like why can’t we let our kids go back to school? Why is it okay that that couple drop their kids off to the grandparents killed themselves? But it’s better it’s it’s not okay that the 95 year old died? Why are we equivalent? equivocating live lives? Why is one life more important than another? Then? You tell us that we’re being like that you’re Why is it okay? It’s not it’s not okay. Why Jim, Jim’s mine was in here the other day interviewing. And he, he’s got franchisees who have literally now have no government support, because they’re on a bridging visa. They’re destitute, they have to go and live in his conference center, and they’re trying to feed this poor woman. You know why? Because she has a dog washing trailer, Jim’s dog washing, she’s not allowed to wash dogs by herself in the trailer. But if you own a dog washing store, like a shop front, you’re allowed to what the hell is that? Well, how about the council’s can mow the grass in groups, but franchisees of gyms who want to move by themselves, No, stay home and go broke?

Molly Knight 32:59
That’s insane. It is insane. See, it makes no sense. None of this is making sense.

Unknown Speaker 33:07
Look, I hate to be so negative, but i i think that we are we are seeing a fight come up against it. And I want to encourage people who are listening, what can you do? We talked about calling members and so on and, and asking questions and keeping your eyes open and looking at what’s happening in your own state. But we also need to think about the key opinion leaders the influences, they have been eerily quiet so much so that I’ve had huge businessman contact me from Australia, one of the biggest businesses in Australia has thousands of staff does hundreds of millions of dollars of revenue every year, totally supports us but can’t say a word. He says I can’t say anything in public because he’s industries quite left wing. And he just can’t afford to. It’s not even for him. He doesn’t he has staff. He doesn’t want to destroy the livelihoods of all this stuff. But we need we need you opinion leaders. We need you leaders to come out and have a rational discussion. Look, the COVID doctors were here they’re doing it. The q C’s are coming out. They’re doing it. The deputy Lord Mary interviewed in here he’s doing it of Melbourne. Other people need to come out not just the same humans who are out there saying, you know, he’s painted as crazy. Some human. We need the normal middle people to come out and say hey, I don’t want this anymore. Thank you.

Molly Knight 34:22
Yes. Yeah. enough’s enough. Yeah, I mean, it’s, it’s, um, I don’t like saying people hide behind. I just can’t do this. Because if everybody stood up and said, This is not right, let’s stick take a step back then it would end tomorrow. Even then. If everybody keeps saying, Oh, I can’t do this. And you know, I’ve got to be careful. Well, that okay, you’re stuck with what you’ve got time to speak up people.

Unknown Speaker 34:53
Let me be an encouragement to you as well. Do you know who I am? I’m a nobody. I’m not even a lawyer. And yet, everyone, thousands of 100 something thousand people are watching my breakdown of the omnibus bill. You know why? Because all the brighter minds out there haven’t been bothered to do it. And I’m actively yelling at them on LinkedIn saying, Come on, you guys are way smarter than me. Please speak like, do an explainer video on this law, you got probably going to find heaps of areas in mind because you’re a real lawyer, but no one’s doing it. If I can do I’ve got no following. You know, I just, I’m just trying to help. And I think a lot of people have expertise in health, like GPS, if you’re a GP come out and tell the stories of Hey, why can’t I prescribe my patient? hydroxychloroquine? I may be wrong, but maybe I should be allowed to try it. Why are you banning it? I’m gonna tell you stories, put a video up on Facebook. And if you need a platform, talk to me. When I have a TV show I have I have the ear of politicians, you know, will will if you got a good story, and you tell it well, we’ll make you famous.

Molly Knight 35:52
Mm hmm.

Yeah, it’s um, well, I just keep saying none of it makes sense. And I know certainly that there’s been a huge amount of advice given to government officials, particularly health ministers about ways that this could be dealt with in a safe manner for everyone. But they take no notice. No notice at all. It’s a no no, we need to you Out with the old and in with the new I think we need a bit of a turnaround. Yeah,

Matt Wong 36:25
well, I think what you hit on it, you know, don’t hide behind influences as I’m trying to tell you people look at me like I’m an influencer. I’m not. I’m normal. Like you guys. Come on. Everyone Speak up. Do you can do it legally, on your phone on Facebook. Please help me come out here and talk.

Molly Knight 36:42
Exactly. And I think too, I mean, if everybody comes out of their houses in Victoria, there aren’t enough police or Defence Force personnel to put them all away. So now you’re talking Hands up.

Matt Wong 36:55
Now you talk about civil disobedience which v Paul who are listening? I’m not suggesting a protest. Thank you, Paul. However, theoretically speaking people, if the BLM March happened to remember that there was 10,000 plus people in Melbourne March is 20 27,000 police officers throughout all of Victoria and what how many 66 point 8 million or something oversee there is no way they could stop mass civil disobedience. Now. I don’t think it’s going to happen. I don’t think Victorians have the stomach for it, as I’ve said. But the point is, why are we living in fear we are the voice of Victoria We are the power of Victoria we are we set the tone, not the Premier’s office and I say this over my videos. Don’t let him set the tone. And you know how you do that. When you’re at Woolworths people are stressed. If you’re at the supermarket, the only place we’re allowed to go once a day, you South Welshman you don’t get it, we’re only allowed to go out once a day one person for two hours. It’s when you’re at Woolworths, Hey, nice to the person in the queue in front of you. Like, you know, let’s let’s let’s take back the city that set the tone of this place. And then Andrews can go to hell with his fear and division in the press conferences. I just don’t listen to his fear anymore. And I think we’ll win that way.

Molly Knight 38:11
Mm hmm.

Yes, some speak up here. wherever you are. Speak out a little bit gently, though. civil disobedience. No, no. But do something. It’s time. People have to get together and they have to stand up. There’s no two ways about that.

Matt Wong 38:30
Oh we’re not allowed to get together.

Molly Knight 38:32
No, that’s right. You know, I think in New South Wales, it’s still a maximum of 20 people at certain things. But you know, weddings and funerals are different. I mean, you know, when you hear things like that, that is the common sense is gone. Because does the virus not go for people that are in isolation or small groups, but always there in big groups, but only if you’re in small group? I mean, it’s, it’s all back to front. We should

Matt Wong 39:06
lvrs is very intelligent Molly. It is nocturnal. It comes out at it used to come out at 8:01pm but as of a week ago, comes at at 901 pm. That’s why we will have to huddle into our homes at 9pm.

Molly Knight 39:19
Yeah, it’s very clever and won’t cross those borders. Yeah. It’s very good. When

Matt Wong 39:26
we make fun, but I’ve had the doctors in here showing me the stats that cases aren’t dead exploding Victorian, a second wave, yes. But deaths did not. Somehow the virus is really struggling to kill us. And that’s not taking away from the people who have tragically died. Like they do all the time. People don’t all the time. My first career was in medicine. I had a medical clinic for nine years. I’m very familiar with death. I hated seeing my patients died very young ages. But coronavirus, as you said it’s similar to the flu. I put the stats I’ve seen it’s a little bit worse than the flu, but it’s certainly not Nothing like a real nothing like the Spanish flu. And it certainly deaths. You know why we switched from measuring tests to cases because the deaths aren’t there anymore.

Molly Knight 40:10
It’s a mess. It is a mess. It’s some people have just been badly lied to. hoodwinked. Yeah, it’s very sad. Very sad. Okay. Is there anything else you could suggest, Matt that could help people move through this a little bit easier so that the fear dissolves a little bit for Victorians

Matt Wong 40:41

Molly Knight 40:43
Well, for everybody really. But Victoria is a tragic at the moment. It’s I think it’s, I mean, it’s almost it’s so serious that people just don’t understand what’s really being done. I think, in fact, I saw a photo today come through a feed of a big camera, two cameras on light poles with loudspeakers. And apparently, they’re on every corner in the CBD in Melbourne. I mean, I have no way to verify that. But that’s what came through on this feed with a photo of these great big box

Matt Wong 41:22
cameras, facial recognition cameras, do you mean?

Molly Knight 41:26
Well, I guess it would be Yeah. I mean, I don’t actually have a problem with cameras. Because, you know, I think, you know, it’s good. You can get the crooks and you can follow people a bit. And but I think having lat Why have they got loudspeakers on them? That makes no sense. Why do you need loudspeakers? And there’s two cameras, a big one at the top and one on the box. So what is that all about? And are they on every street corner?

Matt Wong 41:52
No, they’re not. I’ve seen that picture on social media and I was in the CBD. For a week and a half ago, I traveled all over for work still. And I’m not seeing those. I’m just, I wish I was so I can tell you. It’s terrible. But I’m not saying those. I’m not seeing those errors. Yeah, yeah, I think we have to be careful, everyone, because we all want to find and doing the wrong thing. And he’s doing plenty wrong. Okay? So let’s crucify him for what he’s doing wrong. Do not make up stuff. Because if you make up stuff, no one’s gonna believe us when we point what he is doing wrong. So please just focus on what’s actually verified. There’s plenty of it. Plenty of us.

Molly Knight 42:29
Well, it’s very hard to get verification when people aren’t allowed out more than five kilometers. And, you know, it’s hard to get that verification, I guess. But, you know, obviously, that’s real light camera, and they were around somewhere on

Matt Wong 42:44
Yes, of course, somewhere. But that really goes to your point about hey, what can we do to dissolve the fear? I think, you know, if you go outside now in Melbourne, and you have I asked someone in the interview before this one, how many police have you seen when you go out shopping to check your mask? None? In the whole two months of lockdown? None. Why do you wear your mask then? Is it because you think it’s like say like health reasons? No. Why I don’t get fine, but you never see any police and they Oh, so the thing is place, place rule. This theory by Jeremy Bentham called the panopticon, I won’t go too deep into it, it might be a bit long, but just the idea of being afraid of being caught jumping at shadows. And Dan is relying on this. Now if you look at his press conferences, I was a big believer in him. And I was trying to defend him and support him just on a human level, not on a policy level. But he’s gone so far now where the way he treats us is more akin to an abuser relationship. And he’s starting to really use fear to divide us. And I think we have to be careful not to allow ourselves to get into that fear, even when we’re fighting him. Because then he’s still winning. We have to make sure when I say let’s let’s stand together as Victorians and I made a video called I don’t stand with Dan, I stand with Victoria. The reason is, I don’t think I think he would be most annoyed if we were not afraid of him, or of the virus. I think if we were to come against them and say you’re an idiot, Dan, and I don’t think that would hurt him at all. But I think what would really hurt Dan, is if we got on with our lives, if we were mature, if we were happy. I mean happy in the sense that we just refuse to have his fear within hope. And we started to treat each other well. I think that would piss him off no end. Because I think what you’d start to see your society start to function. little bits of disobedience would happen here and there. Like when I took my daughter to the swing across the road in a quiet suburban neighborhood illegally, I might add a push to on the swing, stuff like that. We’re starting to see sparks of hope within the community by being a bit more more hopeful. So that’s this dissolve the fear. Remember that he doesn’t set what Victoria is I know it looks like that. But he can’t actually control us as much as he’s trying to at the end of the day. You know, there’s a quote by learned Hayes, I think his name was he was a justice, a judge in the US and he said, Liberty lies within the hearts of men and women and no constitution, no law, and no police. Nothing can can revive it when it dies there and in the same way, no constitution, no lawn. No, no executive can kill it when it lives there. So we need to make sure that we remember that we have we have that power.

Molly Knight 45:31
Hmm. Yeah, that’s, that’s lovely. Yeah, we do have the power. That’s right. Okay, Matt, thank you. That’s been really interesting. And I really enjoy your balanced approach. Thank you. It’s, um, it’s great. What What is your website, Matt, so people can go and have a look and follow you

Matt Wong 45:54
probably just had to discernible is. There’s two ways of spelling discernible for some reason I chose that a virgin. So just discern and enable. I’m on Facebook, Twitter, not Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Instagram. But yeah, I have a TV show as well, which is cool that I post on there with. It’s called What’s it called? Not? It was called not the project is I think I already told you. We’re trying to fight the project. We have we’ve renamed it to the people’s project. But we have people on like, we have Craig Kelly on Friday, and we have all the COVID doctors on we have just incredible people. You can find me there. And hey, thank you so much, Molly, for having me on. I hope it helped someone out there.

Molly Knight 46:37
Yeah, I’m pretty sure it will, Matt, it’s certainly your balanced approach. I think he’s very calming. I found it calming. And, you know, it’s good to know that. You know, like, when I saw that photo of the camera with the loudspeakers, I just went back and said, Can this be verified? Please? Nobody gets back to me. So it’s, I guess, people perhaps like, they just put stuff out there and then move on to the next thing. So you’re left sort of going, Is this real? Is it not real? How do we respond? Do we do anything? Do we do nothing? So

Matt Wong 47:14
it’s like the children thing they can take your children think that? Yeah, that’s been misrepresented.

Molly Knight 47:20
Hmm. Yeah. So they they won’t just come into your house and take your kids less? Yeah. I mean, you can understand if there’s a serious reason, I can understand that at any time. Children need to be safe. But yeah, yeah. So thank you for your balanced approach methods. It’s been wonderful and your information is enormously valuable. Thank you. Thank you for coming on. Nice.

Matt Wong 47:46
Thank you. My pleasure.

Molly Knight 47:47
Thank you. Good night, everyone. Thank you for joining us, and I hope you’ve gained as much from this talk as I certainly have. And yeah, thank you. Stay, stay well. stay aware and awake, and let’s get our country back on to a good economic and healthy footing. Good night, everyone.



Judy Wilyman PhD joined us Thursday September 17 on Facebook Live to discuss the responses of Governments in Australia to Covid-19. In her live discussion with Molly Knight she covered :
  • unscientific restrictions
  • flawed medical testing
  • conflicts of interest in government advisory panels
  • the Covid-19 vaccine chosen for Australians



Judy became interested in the vaccination topic in 1993 after vaccinating her first child. She began studying the safety, efficacy and necessity for each vaccine on the schedule and in 2015 completed a PhD at the University of Wollongong. Her thesis was titled ‘A critical analysis of the Australian Government’s rationale for its vaccination policy’ in which she presents information on the claims made by the Government about vaccines that are not supported by scientific evidence. Her book based on her PhD research titled ‘Australia’s Loss of Health Freedom’ is now available to buy.

Click on the image below to watch the full interview:


The complete transcript follows – E&OE :

Molly Knight 0:04
Welcome to Health Australia Party Thursday night Talk. Thank you for joining us. Tonight we’ve got a cracker of a talk. And I’ll be introducing Dr. Judy wildermann. In just a minute. What? Excuse me, what I wanted to do is just to start tonight by reading you something that Health Australia Party has launched, it’s something pretty special. And we’ve asked for three primary actions for the Victorian Alp to remove Daniel Andrews as premier immediately the immediate revision of the unrealistic roadmap including a reduction of targets and restrictions, which are not backed by science and an immediate full independent investigation into Daniel Andrews leadership over the COVID-19 response and the integrity of the Alp government under Daniel Andrews, so please Go to the Health Australia Party web page and look at this action and take part in it Victorians. You need to stand up now. Okay, so tonight we’ll be I’ll be talking with Dr. Judy wildermann. Judy has a Bachelor of Science degree and a Masters of Science. So she’s got a great science background Remember that? And she practiced as a science teacher for 20 years. In 2015, Judy completed her PhD through the Willingham University. The thesis is titled, a critical analysis of the Australian Government’s rationale for its vaccination policy. Yes, and it provides scientific arguments showing that the government’s shedule of vaccines is the most likely cause of the chronic illnesses that are so rampant in our children today and Also, it’s implemented in the many deaths that we’re observing in children today. It’s very, very important work. And I must tell you too, that Judy’s thesis, which is available on her web page has been downloaded over 28,000 times. Now I’ve got to tell you, nobody reads thesis is because they often very long and boring but 28,000 downloads. That’s awesome. So tonight, we’re going to look at a few issues with us. She’ll discuss the unscientific restrictions and the flawed medical testing. That were the excesses and the many, many conflicts of interest in government advisory panel. That’s huge to discuss the COVID-19 vaccine chosen for Australians. And also, we’ll talk about the government vaccine sheduled linked to the chronic illness and Importantly, the undone science in government claims of safety and efficacy of vaccines. It’s back to it is a big topic. It’s controversial. it ignites many emotions in people. So please feel free to ask any questions that you have. And after our discussion, I can put the questions to Judy. So with enormous pleasure, I welcome Dr. Judy wildermann. Judy, thank you so much for joining us.

Dr Judy Wilyman 3:31
No problem, Molly. It’s lovely to be here. Thank you,

Molly Knight 3:35
Judy. I’d like to start off tonight by asking you about your journey up to and through your PhD. How did you come to consider your topic for the PhD? And what yet just your journey there because I know it’s been quite a journey and there’s been a lot of ups and downs for you. And having to change. What do you call it at universities from one house to another? Just to do like the back of one thing? Yeah. Yeah, one thing leads to another because of politics. I guess that’s fair, isn’t it? So can you start there and tell us what led you to do this work? And yeah, just your journey, Judy, please. Yes, yes.

Dr Judy Wilyman 4:25
Well, I guess the bottom line is I was teaching in the schools at an interesting time in history. So in fact, I started teaching in 1986. So I was there pre the expansion of the government’s vaccination program so and then happened in 1990. Many, many of you will know that. In 1996, Ronald Reagan in the US passed the act which removed all liability from pharmaceutical companies with reference to the harm that they can they cause in individuals. And so once that liability was removed, because prior to that prior to 1986, there were so many Vaccine Injury claims that the vaccine companies were saying, well, we can’t go on producing vaccines if we’re gonna have to pay all this liability. So they fixed that problem through politics and liability was removed in 1996. And with that, by 1990, we started to see many more vaccines being added to the schedule. And, and, you know, during that time I was teaching in the schools. And so, and at the same time, as the vaccines were being added to the country, indications to vaccines started to be reduced. So all that family history and knowledge of, you know, families that have genes that make them predisposed to say allergies or anaphylaxis, more Have neurological damage. Those contraindications were gradually removed and narrowed right up until 2016 when they mandated vaccines and reduced all of them completely, except for anaphylaxis. So the interesting thing is separately prior to 1990, we didn’t have this autism, this ADHD, the anaphylaxis in the schools, you know, the seizures, convulsions, etc. All of which I will emphasize is listed on the package inserts for vaccines as side effects to vaccines. So it wasn’t unknown. And medical in the medical profession knew that. You know, some people are predisposed to them. But without parents knowledge, the vaccines were added to the schedule and throughout so through the 90s you know, I was just amazed at the principals were sitting around discussing, well, you know, what’s causing all this autism what’s causing this ADHD. And, you know, I started having children in 1993. So that’s when I was exposed to that the expansion in the program, the number of vaccines had already started to double. And you know, that the chronic illness skyrocketed through the 90s, literally. So by 2008, the chronic illness had increased fivefold. And in schools, we now have pictures of students in the staff, who Anna electic. So we had to be able to identify them in the playground and be aware that even the smell of peanut butter could cause this electric shock, which in some cases is fatal.

Molly Knight 7:49
And exactly yeah,

Dr Judy Wilyman 7:50
these are life threatening conditions, and many of them actually prevent children reaching their potential in life and in the case of autism, and You know, many other neurological disabilities, parents have become long term carriers for these children with seizures and convulsions. And when we asked the government even at that time through the 90s and the early 2000s, they asked the government, you know, have you investigated that link between the 12 to 16 vaccines that were being recommended for infants from day one of life, and that increase in chronic illness? They said, Oh, no, no, that’s just a coincidence. And of course, that’s there’s the key. You need systematic evidence based medicine requires systematic investigation of causal factors. And the one factor they have always removed when they’ve looked at the increase in chronic chronic illness, and environmental factors that could be causing it. I’ve always left out the vaccination program which injects chemicals goes directly into the bloodstream and tissues of the body. So that’s that’s the key. That’s where I started and I became very intrigued to find out what was in a vaccine that is being injected into every tissue of the infant that is developing.

Molly Knight 9:16
Yes, it’s a, it’s, um, well, I think it’s a disgrace that the science isn’t done and that they have no liability. I mean, as a health practitioner, if I break someone’s nail, I’m in trouble. But he they can inject these things cause seizures, anaphylaxis and add autism. That’s right and nothing nothing.

Dr Judy Wilyman 9:42
And parents are simply dismissed as even when they know that this has been caused by the vaccine. The doctors will dismiss it as anecdotal evidence and just a coincidence, you know, and then they’ll dismiss parents who want the As anti vaxxers and and label people it is and, you know, so disrespectful to parents who are the ones that actually know their children the best and who want evidence based medicine be behind this. So false and misleading information has been presented in the media and by governments. Yes, you know, to hide this fact that the correlation has never been investigated.

Molly Knight 10:29
It’s quite tragic. It’s some, I actually don’t know anyone who’s just an anti vaxxer. Because the question vaccines have usually got a very valid reason for becoming a little bit cautious about

Dr Judy Wilyman 10:44
what parent wouldn’t be against vaccines if they were safe and effective and that the evidence was provided. There is no It makes no sense. And on top of that, the government has been doubly disrespectful because they Then promote vaccines, such as the hipping cough vaccine on anecdotal evidence, which is a parent Whose child is, you know, claimed to have been died of say he’d been called for another disease. But often there’s no evidence of, you know, how they’ve died. The context of that death is all is never presented. But the very fact that you can promote vaccines on anecdotal evidence, but then suppress the anecdotal evidence of the harm that vaccines are causing. I mean, that is criminal. It really is and parents need to be angry about this

Molly Knight 11:39
is quite a great, a quite a great, we just need the truth. So tell me, let’s go back to your PhD. So you became interested having children and looking at what’s in them. So tell me about the journey to get permission to do your Ph. D. PhD.

Dr Judy Wilyman 11:59
Yes. I did, I decided that I should be the master of science first in population health. So I enrolled in the public health School of Public Health in the Faculty of Health. Because I, you know, I thought, well, I’ll just test the waters to see if there is a problem here, you know, I had started vaccinating my children. So I wanted to know that I was doing the right thing. And, you know, just that was only a possibility that the vaccines could be the cause. At so I completed the Masters of Science with a major project on the whooping cough vaccine and the government’s policy, which wasn’t matching the evidence that I’ve found in the thesis. So but that thesis got a high distinction from the academics and I decided that I would like to continue that research with a PhD. But the Faculty of Health decided they wouldn’t provide supervisors for that project investigating and the role of vaccines in Controlling infectious diseases, they decided that it was better suited to the social sciences and in the Faculty of Arts

Molly Knight 13:12
and rather strange decision really isn’t being a health issue.

Dr Judy Wilyman 13:16
Well, that’s right. It’s a health issue. And in fact, see, here’s the key. infectious diseases were controlled through political and economic decisions that control the environment made changes to the environment and lifestyle factors. Because infectious agents are not independent causes of disease. They’re more virulent, if there’s environmental factors or host characteristics when your body’s rundown and stressed and psychological factors. All of these things come into how serious a disease will be in any person if they’re infected with the virus. And, of course, it’s technically termed social medicine. infectious diseases, you know, throughout the 1900s was always under the umbrella of social medicine, which is your public health or mental health. But the health aspect that doesn’t require medications to control infectious diseases by 1950 in Australia, all of the infectious diseases had been controlled deaths were very, very rare in children to to the childhood diseases, and in fact, they took measles whooping cough and influenza off the national notifiable disease list in 1950. So more I think that the, the deaths and illnesses to infectious diseases declined at simultaneously to the improvements in sanitation, hygiene, nutrition, big factor Smaller family sizes. So by 1950 children weren’t dying of these infectious diseases, none of them, none of us, none of them. And there were still cases of these diseases, but they were mild and mostly asymptomatic. in developed countries, you see, a as well,

Molly Knight 15:21
exactly the

Dr Judy Wilyman 15:23
herd immunity creating herd immunity. They that’s where the asymptomatic cases came in, and they’re critical to developing herd immunity. They are not a threat in a developed country, because people that get infected in a developed country 99% of them will be either asymptomatic or very mild symptoms, and that goes for covid and influenza infections as well. This is why it is unscientific to even consider locking down a healthy population before let me say before You’ve even experienced that Mars under your own environmental conditions and host characteristics. And in countries which have differing quality of health care systems. Hmm.

Molly Knight 16:14
Makes no sense. Does it make no

Dr Judy Wilyman 16:16
sense whatsoever and so from 19 from throughout the 1900s, we’ve always controlled infectious diseases by isolating the sick people, you isolate the sick people. And then in serious cases, you could contact the trace, do trace contacting, so any of their, their contacts, that you can trace those and if they’re sick, then you would isolate those or you know, but that’s in very serious cases to isolate any healthy person that has no symptoms. And I will make the point that Scott Morrison and he tries a game was not Applying for the emergency powers on a pandemic of a novel virus new influenza virus. I mean Corona viruses mutate every year, and the first cases of coronavirus were in like December. And Scott Morrison applied for emergency powers to shut down the country on the 25th of January. Now why was he even thinking that new mutated Coronavirus, what would be a problem in Australia? We don’t get pandemics. They’re not pandemics natural pandemics unlikely in developed countries after 1950. So yes, you might get an outbreak of a disease but you need to go through the appropriate steps before you lock down a healthy population and make them sick up with every directive that was brought in by this government. Yes, there’s nothing that makes sense about you know, the measures that have been applied. To this outbreak of disease, which didn’t even hadn’t even reached Australia, when the government was applying for the emergency powers,

Molly Knight 18:10
definitely makes no sense, does it?

Dr Judy Wilyman 18:13
It doesn’t. And I will even point out that in that article, it was an article in The Sydney Morning Herald, and it was published on the 25th of February. And it actually states in the article that Scott Morrison was applying for the emergency powers. Even though a possible outcome at that time was that this virus would turn out to be a nose no stronger than a normal influenza virus. It’s actually stated in the article. So there were three possible outcomes and give us applying for emergency powers that led us into a police state that closed our borders and damaged businesses. There is no sense in that whatsoever and real questions need to be asked. Absolutely. Because in February, the the World Health Organization hadn’t even assessed the human to human transmission of that virus. They didn’t make that call till the 11th of March. But of course, if you apply for the emergency powers on the 21st of January, then they can be enacted as soon as it’s called on the 11th of March. And I will point out that on the 19th of March, the UK public health unit, downgraded that virus, and said it was it was no longer considered a virus of high consequence in the population, and it was not transmitting any more quickly than other influenza viruses. That was on the 19th of March, one week after the who had declared this this global pandemic, when, you know, the virus hadn’t even entered many countries when that statement was made.

Molly Knight 19:58
Well, clearly, there’s a deeper agenda it plays a bit because there is yes. Yeah. It’s, um, it’s disappointing that we’re being manipulated and run for deeper agendas that we aren’t told about that. As human beings, we don’t have this freedom of information that I know it’s been applied for. And people just get locked out. They can’t, will not release any information on the numbers, the true numbers

Dr Judy Wilyman 20:34
in the Gazette. And, you know, very interesting point was when someone applied through the Freedom of Information Act, to get for the government to provide a test that 100% proves that the SIRs Cove to virus is actually being identified in any of these deaths or cases that are being reported. So kind of specifically, I do To find that virus, the answer was no relevant documents have been found. And this is, again, a very serious point because we know that the PCR tests and the antibody tests are not diagnostic tools for that specific virus. The PCR test is not a licensed diagnostic tool anyway. And therefore, it cannot be used to identify the virus and said we don’t have any proof of causality here. That is critical to determine, you know, to declaring a global pandemic you need proof of causality. Before you make that statement, and, you know, I can see clearly how they have created the pandemic. Because in my thesis, I researched the swine flu vaccine, the swine flu pandemic of 2009 That’s where a lot of this, they’ve copied the same format. But but one big thing that happened in 2009 was that the World Health Organization changed the definition of a pandemic. You see, they couldn’t have called a global pandemic, either in 2009, or 2020. If they hadn’t changed the definition because a pandemic is when you see deaths and illnesses in the community. Everywhere you can see those deaths and illnesses in the community enormous numbers of deaths and illnesses. It’s not just an epidemic, it’s a pandemic. But what they was in 2009 was they removed that clause, they didn’t need to be enormous numbers of deaths and illnesses in the community anymore. It only needed to be increased numbers of that disease. But many of those increased numbers are non serious cases of disease in a developed country, flu and here, we’re talking about a few flu like virus, you know, flu like symptoms? Yes. So yes, it just sticks up. There’s a lot of things hidden in statistics, particularly disease statistics. And that’s what’s happened here. The government has been using fraudulent statistics in that this PCR test is not a licensed diagnostic tool, it cannot identify a whole virus and say that that virus was present in those cases, it only it only identifies segments of a virus, and in this case, segments of RNA, so the genome of that virus, but but not the whole virus, so and because there’s this other related viruses and so,

Molly Knight 23:46
yes, there are many Corona viruses, aren’t there many

Dr Judy Wilyman 23:50
family of Corona viruses and 40% of the population will have been exposed to those because they cause the common cold. So that said, I swear The antibody test again, is not going to tell you anything about whether you’ve got COVID, it can tell you that you may have some immunity to coronaviruses because your antibody tied to it to those viruses is raised. But it can’t tell you if you’ve got an active case of COVID. Or even if it was SAS code two, it’s not specific enough to do that. So there’s reports of cases, people need to ask what was the definition of a case that they were reporting, many of these cases didn’t have any disease symptoms. So that is so fraudulent because Healthy People shouldn’t be considered cases of disease. And in some cases, the cases might have had flu like symptoms or cough or sneeze. But either way, we weren’t told about the context of the cases that were being reported to frighten people about this virus that had already been downgraded from a high consequence infectious disease. And clearly in the community, we weren’t seeing these enormous deaths. And so it is fraudulent reporting and fraudulent to use this, these tests and that the Premier’s and government can be liable, personally liable under civil rights law for that sort of reporting.

Molly Knight 25:23
And they need to be called on it because growing our economy destroys reserves, and

Dr Judy Wilyman 25:29
they’re removing our right to control how we treat our own bodies, what we inject into our own bodies, even using a mask, it’s invasive, and it is causing ill health in a large number of people. The studies are very clear, and and healthy people should not be getting medically tested. That’s invasive. It’s an invasive test and we have a right to control our own bodies and this is protected under all the international health covenants. People do need to resist. And, you know, we’ve got to stop complying with these directives.

Molly Knight 26:08
Yes, exactly. And I think people need to remember that government officials work for us. They are our employees, basically. And they need to do the right things for us for our betterment, not for big corporations and their mates out there. So I think many members of parliament and politicians absolutely forget what they’re there for and why they’re there.

Dr Judy Wilyman 26:36
I think that’s a very good point. And I have watched over the last decade, as the public his voice was removed from government policy. And, and that was, in fact it’s happened over at least since 2005. Because that’s when the International Health Regulations were designed by the corporate partners in the Global Alliance for vaccines and immunization that GAVI Alliance, so those corporate partners, which include the Federation of pharmaceutical companies, as well as the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, and, of course, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation. Exactly. I designed the introduction, influence in designing the International Health Regulations that the World Health Organization then required all member countries to sign up to. But that was done without the public’s knowledge or consultation.

Molly Knight 27:35
Exactly. And it mustn’t be done that way. We, we need to take back our power.

Dr Judy Wilyman 27:40
Well, I’m sorry.

That simple signing of that up to the International Health Regulations through the World Health Organization, we lost our sovereignty then, and that allowed corporations to then control our government and the directives that were put in place once the The World Health Organization called declared a global pandemic. And so, you know, the corporations are controlling these governments. Yes, yes, changes to our political system, we can get our voice back in the government, but it’s been removed from the media in these public debates. And I have been suppressed and censored for the last decade, this academic research, and there’s so much money and greasing the wheels so that people wouldn’t need to keep their jobs and hence, they’re not speaking up in support of freedom of academic speech and the right for me to give my research in Council venues. You know, the Lord Mayor of Sydney in 2017. You know, there was a big article in the media saying that, you know, I shouldn’t we shouldn’t be advertising my talk. On the the city of Sydney’s web page, and I got notification from some council venues that I was not allowed to present my academic research because it was simply by dismissing it as anti vaccination research. And people have accepted that label not understanding that that is the public interest in vaccination policy, the risks of vaccines, and how does that compare to the benefits of vaccines? See, that’s the other side of it. What proof has the government provided that vaccines actually control these diseases? That’s what I looked at in my PhD. And the government has not provided the statistics of the backs of number of vaccinated and unvaccinated cases of the these diseases that we get every year. Now that would prove categorically how effective the vaccine was. No Time has those two To explain us to support vaccination policy. And to add to that, and the government’s, the the I have a quote from the chairman of our vaccine advisory board that states that the Australian Government, you do not they do not need to prove that a vaccine can create herd immunity in the population before that vaccine is listed on the program. So, we have a government that says, since we have a government that promotes vaccines by making people feel guilty about community herd immunity, you must vaccinate for the sake of the community. Yet those vaccines do not have to be demonstrated to prove herd immunity before they are listed on that on that schedule. And there is no proof because they won’t use those statistics, statistics that are important in other cases of a disease let’s say measles or chickenpox that are hospitalized or all that People die of that disease. So if you looked at how many vaccinated people were dying or being hospitalized with measles or chicken pox and you looked at how many unvaccinated were getting those diseases and of course you could find out how effective the vaccine is. And what we what my thesis did show was that many highly vaccinated communities, we’ve got a 90 to 95% vaccination rate. I still getting outbreaks of these diseases and they’re in the vaccinated children.

Molly Knight 31:34
Hmm, yes, this is the measles. Yeah,

Dr Judy Wilyman 31:37
that’s right. We need to start demanding this evidence before any mandatory vaccinations come in. Man already Australia has gone too far down this road, but that’s simply because the media has not given us a voice the parents have voice in this debate, and nor have the official channels at the university. I there are many strategies they’ve used to suppress my research. For the universities and, you know, organizations that put on these conferences and select out certain, you know, perspectives of risk and benefit of these procedures.

Molly Knight 32:15
Well, it’s very big business, isn’t it? Very big business. The vaccination business. Yeah. What about the conflict of interest, Judy, in government advisory panels or committees? Can you talk a bit about that?

Dr Judy Wilyman 32:31
Yes. You realize I studied the conflicts of interest right up to 2015. And, you know, it’s, it’s incredible what conflicts exist. The majority of advisors on these boards have financial links to the vaccine companies. And through the 90s, right up until 2015. Chairman of the attention vaccine advisory Report Terry Nolan. He started in 1990 at the Murdoch Children’s Research Institute. And he in that time, he set up a program called Virgo, which is the largest research and development program for vaccines in Australia. And that was 1990. And then in 2005, he left that job at the Murdoch Children’s Research Institute to become the chairman of our vaccine advisory board to the government of tachy, the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunization and he was the chairman of that body for 10 years. As chairman, he was required to report to recommend vaccines directly to the health minister. And so he did that for 10 years. And he also had a second role during that decade. He was the deputy chair of the National Health and Medical Research Council. And as Deputy Chair he was involved In influencing decisions on funding for research, and if you remove funding from a particular area of research, then you don’t have the evidence to act with me. You don’t have the empirical hard evidence to say vaccines are safe or effective. If you don’t do that actual evidence, you can make those claims without the evidence. And that’s what’s happened here. The empirical causal study of vaccinated unvaccinated children has never been done. And they don’t use an inert placebo in the unvaccinated group and look at long term health effects of these 12 to 16 vaccines combined in an infant never been done. The placebo that’s often used is another vaccine. You know, so if you’re

Molly Knight 34:52
less doesn’t make sense, does it?

Dr Judy Wilyman 34:53
Well, if you can’t call that a safety study, if you don’t have the vaccine to see how that performs against the new vaccine. Well, that’s not a safety study. That’s a study to compare vaccines. Yes. But those are the the medical industry is claiming those to be safety studies. And again, that’s fraudulent. Hmm. And I think that has happened with this AstraZeneca COVID vaccine. I believe that they used a meningococcal vaccine as the placebo in the unvaccinated group. You know, it’s all very well to declare that but you’re not doing a safety study if you’re using the meningococcal vaccine as a placebo because the mustn’t have any effect on the body. And we know vaccines have neurological damage caused neurological damage. It is well documented. And you know, and willingboro syndrome causes seizures, convulsions, you know, meningitis they’re all listed as side effects on the package. source has been for decades.

Molly Knight 36:03
And they’re only listed there because they are, excuse me, known effects, they’re known effects of these axes. That’s why

Dr Judy Wilyman 36:10
they listed and salutely. And to say it’s just a coincidence, parents are actually being told by doctors Oh, that’s just a coincidence. And even the head of the vaccination program, Peter McIntosh, who was there from 1997 until 2000, and December 2017. And he was happy to just say all but correlation doesn’t equal causality without acknowledging that a correlation is a strong indicator of causality. And it’s a relationship that needs to be investigated if you’re claiming to use evidence based medicine. And this is a very sad fact and but the media allows them to get away with it. They haven’t made these government officials accountable for this topic. See, and it is the parents that have been smeared, our reputations destroyed. And this happens on Wikipedia. It happens in all mainstream medium. And if anyone listening wants to understand how that has happened, the pandemic movie, part two, called indoctrination, describes how this has happened and how the media is now singing from the same corporate songbook, with Wikipedia through the funding arrangements, you know, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation pretty well funds, you know, as it has funding in every institution, they have front organizations to hide some of the links. Yes, yeah, deeply involved, do it. And of course, you know, we’ve always known that if the media doesn’t report on it, then of course, it Doesn’t happen, you know? Yes, you don’t hear about it, and hence you’ve got this false reality. And the media is creating a false reality about vaccines, because they’re just not reporting the other side of this debate, and, and the very real risks and lack of benefit of many of these vaccines. Hmm.

Molly Knight 38:20
Yes. I mean, it would be wonderful if we could have the proof that vaccines do what they claims, and I don’t think anybody would quibble or not want to take a vaccine, if it was proven that it doesn’t cause any ill effects. But that’s just not how it is.

Dr Judy Wilyman 38:41
No, no, and they they literally haven’t done the empirical science that would prove safety and efficacy. I mean, a lot. One other thing that people probably don’t know is that even with the efficacy of vaccines, they don’t they don’t demonstrate The vaccine can prevent the disease in people, they use a surrogate endpoint, which is antibody titer. But our immune systems are much more complex than just antibody titer. And this is well known and Stanley Plotkin, the father of vaccinology stated himself that they don’t know what is a reasonable measure for, you know, antibody titer to protect against the measles infection, for example. And that goes with many other vaccines as well. Often people with a high antibody titer still get the disease and people with a low antibody todich can be protected from disease. So it’s not a direct relationship. And people need to know that there’s more to the immune system than just antibody titer. Yet, that’s all a vaccine does is raise the antibody titer and that endpoint is not sufficient to form proof that the back saints are effective in preventing the disease in people. And, you know, people just need to remember that the vaccines weren’t used to control the disease in terms of reducing deaths and serious illness that was done prior to the majority of these vaccines being used. So there is no justification for any mandatory vaccine. The only question for people is which vaccines do they want to use? But that needs to be a voluntary choice? Yes. There’s no suggestion that you’re putting the community at risk if you don’t have a vaccine, because the government hasn’t provided evidence that a vaccine can even cause herd immunity. You know, and we know that they weren’t needed to control the deaths because the deaths were reduced through changes to the environment. You know, environmental changes our lifestyle and nutrition and boosting our Constitution. So we were stronger in the virulence of these infections declined without The vaccines?

Molly Knight 41:01
Yeah. And that’s all graphed, isn’t it on is that the Department of Health’s webpage that they’ve got all these figures and graphs? And you can you can see clearly how these diseases had well and truly declined by about the 50s, wasn’t it? Because I mean, I grew up and

Dr Judy Wilyman 41:17
really by the 50s, it was 950 when they removed measles, whooping cough and influenza. Okay, that was in the Commonwealth yearbook of Australia in 1953. And now, so what we’re saying here is that yes, there were still cases of measles, but they were non serious, so they can report on them. Because what’s the point of self limiting? It gives long term immunity in the individual, and it creates herd immunity. So that’s why they were removed from the National notifiable disease list. Now, compare that to 2016 to 2020. Every measles cases, is treated as a public health emergency. Yes, when the media reports on them, I don’t tell you if that was a serious case of disease or a non serious case of disease. They don’t tell you if it was a vaccinated case or an unvaccinated case you get no context.

Molly Knight 42:09
Or if there were co liabilities with that,

Dr Judy Wilyman 42:12
as well. And any case that wasn’t hospitalized certainly didn’t need to be reported because then person is better in a week or two, and then they’ve got long term immunity. So So this is all the history that a PhD that’s the history that I’ve studied, and and what they’re trying to do is rewrite history. And they’ve been quite successful because the school curriculums from 1990 onwards, changed, and they started to promote the fact that vaccines control based diseases, and that’s, you know, they create herd immunity, and the vaccines don’t cause autism. Now, all of that is indoctrination. And it’s been happening for three decades. My PhD wouldn’t exist if, you know, it wasn’t showing that those things are simply not true. And the medical industry did try to ensure that it was removed from the University website. They set up a petition when it was first put up. Oh, my goodness, yes. And they and they got to the medical industry with their lobby groups. They’re very powerful in Australia. Yes. And they got about 2000 signatures on it, but the Vice Chancellor of one gone University said, We are standing by that PhD, because he knew that it had gone through the very rigorous procedures that they have in place for a PhD. Yes. So then the lobby group said, Oh, but they didn’t check Judy, why elements PhD, but you see, they didn’t have to, because the air had gone through all the procedures, I had to do twice as much as anybody else to actually get it approved. And, you know, so all the way down the road they have attempted to suppress and remove the history of vaccines that is presented in my PhD.

Molly Knight 43:59
Well Because it’s a big business, I think the dollar always wins, doesn’t it? Yeah, it’s all about money always. Um, so where does that leave us with this COVID vaccine? Have you got a lot of info about what’s coming and in Nash and what it might how it might affect the human race to say,

Dr Judy Wilyman 44:24
Well, you know, you, it’s quite intriguing to me that, you know, the government can claim for decades and provide a standard response to everybody that asks about the safety of vaccines. We’ve always been taught for the last two or three decades. Vaccines are safe and effective, and they’ve been tested for 10 years minimum before they’ve been put on the market. And now you have a government saying that they’re going to bring in a genetically engineered vaccine with mRNA in it in space of next 18 months. Hmm. You know, and so, I mean, there’s the key for parents, you know, if so, so now, you know the, the why would we believe that any of the other vaccines have been tested for 10 years, which we know they weren’t. For example, the Gardasil vaccine was fast tracked in the same way and put on the market in 2006. Again, having used in adequate surrogate endpoints for advocacy, and no no in placebos in properly designed safety studies with significant power to prove anything. So again, a tragedy. Yes,

Molly Knight 45:42
yeah, absolutely. Quite.

Dr Judy Wilyman 45:45
It is an experiment on the population because it’s an end. It’s an unmonitored one. Because the government doesn’t use an active surveillance system once it’s in phase four trials, which simply means it’s in the population But they now are using it in the population. That’s your phase four trials, you’re the experiment. But the government does not actively follow up the health outcomes of every vaccinated person. And you would need to do that for at least five to 10 years to find the patterns and the frequency of chronic illness or deaths that have been caused by these vaccines. That’s fine that the government can’t provide those statistics. And they’ll simply say, you know, serious vaccine reactions are ran. Well, that’s not a quantity. And they shouldn’t be getting away with actually saying that when people’s health, the health of the population has declined significantly as we’ve increased the number of vaccines in the population.

Molly Knight 46:47
Oh, absolutely. I mean, excuse me. I’ve been in practice since 1983. And I have seen an absolute decline in children’s health. By that, I mean, I don’t Have stats but more each year more and more children I see as patients and their chronically ill, it’s not Oh yeah, I’ve got a really serious infection. No, it’s these chronic aches and pains. It’s my child keeps getting cold after cold, you’re cold and, and I’ve seen that grow over the years, to the point where now probably the last six to eight years seeing a lot of teenagers with all sorts of mental issues anxiety, panic attacks, depression, and I never saw before ever. No, no, my slide these vaccines as they get more and more of them and there’s dozens of things.

Dr Judy Wilyman 47:46
Those ones Yeah, Molly’s disgrace, similar experiences myself in the school system and you with the natural path. And we’ve watched this chronic illness skyrocket. And then what you call ecological evidence, when scientists and governments don’t do the right thing and investigate a direct dose response relationship showing a correlation, then the the best evidence you’ve got is the health of the population. And that’s called ecological evidence. And then why what drives me back to the university was I was seeing that ecological evidence of chronic illnesses, autoimmune diseases that are, you know, even the mechanism is known in dogs, they knew that the vaccines were causing auto antibodies, because of some of the proteins in the manufacturing process that was so similar to human proteins. So you know, when they manufacture a vaccine, it can be on calf tissue. It can be on chicken eggs, it can be on even human fetal cells it for the measles, the MMR vaccine, human fetal cells. Well, well, that’s that those Proteins foreign proteins are so similar to our own proteins that the body makes what are called auto antibodies. And that leads to autoimmune diseases and what what has skyrocketed in children? Yes, no immune disease lothbrok rheumatoid arthritis, chronic fatigue syndromes, multiple sclerosis, lupus, they’re all disease, you know, and that ecological evidence is very important. So, just recently with them, this coven endemic or planned me, I was introduced to Dr. Judy, Judy mikovits. His research and her experiences parallel mine in that she was actually exposing the mechanisms by which the vaccines cause that chronic illness. So whilst I was associating the chronic illness with the schedule, she actually identified the mechanisms by which the biological mechanisms by which the vaccines Cause, you know, the neurological damage and autoimmune diseases. Because, you know, again, her reputation was smeared just like mine was she even child, you know, tragically and that’s the lengths to which they went to try and cover up that research. In my case, allegations of academic misconduct were made by a leader of one of Australia’s biggest medical industry lobby group. You know, dr. john Cunningham was allowed to make allegations of academic misconduct, eight years after my master’s thesis actually watered and I was given a high distinction for it. And when they investigated it, there was complete fabrication. And I was given an apology and compensation, but the media would not do a press release and say that the allegations have been False and fabricated. And yes, my name had been smeared with these allegations when they had been made prior to the investigation going ahead, you know, so all of that humiliation, all of the damage to my reputation. Yes, the media did not take action in the public interest to let them know that not a single thing in that in my whooping cough research that had been smeared with that allegation was changed. It is still sitting unchanged on the website, because there was not Nope, no problems with that. And that’s in the public interest.

Molly Knight 51:38
It’s very hard to, for me to understand how the media can be so blatantly biased and I guess perhaps they bought and sold as well, I suppose.

Dr Judy Wilyman 51:55
You know, yeah, they’re using the argument of false balance and

Molly Knight 52:01
By that,

Dr Judy Wilyman 52:02
by false balance, you need to weigh up the weight of evidence for the risks and the benefits of a procedure. So, in fact, it is a real thing. But it’s been misused in this case, because I have now weighed up the risks and the benefits of vaccines from an independent study with all the available publicly available government evidence. And I have discovered that the risks of that program far outweigh any benefits that have been provided in the government documents. And hence, it would be false balance. And it’s actually the reverse of what the media is doing. The false balance is in this promotion of the benefits of vaccines, and just claiming that, that the risks are minimal, you know, in fact, it’s the other way round. You know, there’s a high risk from the ground By schedule of 12 to 16 vaccines, and it would be inappropriate to present a balanced picture of the benefits and risks when we know that the risks are really high for using 12 to 16 vaccines in a genetically diverse population, that’s what people need to keep in mind. You don’t medicate an entire population simply because everybody has individual genetics. Hmm. And so and so the false balance argument is being misused and it needs to be reversed. They using arguments that we should be using to say that, you know, the risks are overwhelmingly greater than the benefits of this combined program. And it needs to be properly assessed, and certainly parents need to have that autonomy, assigned to doctors, actually, their autonomy in promoting health has been removed as well because we need our autonomy back and parents have the right to do side which vaccines they should use in their own children because we are all genetically individual. And that is a crime against humanity.

Molly Knight 54:10
Yeah. And it’s a human right to make choices for your

Dr Judy Wilyman 54:13
privacy of their bodies, their autonomy and bodily integrity, and it’s protected in every international human rights covenant that Australia has ratified, not just signed up to we’ve ratified it, but the one step we didn’t take was to put it into domestic laws. And apparently that’s why that you know, the medical industry could lobby our governments and bringing mandatory backs using the Murdoch News Corp media, because men have now owns 80% of our media in Australia. There’s no diversity of opinion happening. And and by putting this by simply promoting it as no jab, no pay. Anybody that didn’t have children, so Oh, okay. In unvaccinated means you haven’t had one or two vaccines. What what was never presented in any media radical without pushing through that policy? Was that unvaccinated mean that you hadn’t had that the children hadn’t had a minimum of 12 vaccines in their first year of law. And that that meant 24 doses, by the way.

Molly Knight 55:17
That’s right. Yeah,

Dr Judy Wilyman 55:19
I took two months. I tested it for, you know, four months, six months. And so, by the age of one, no job, no pay and play actually meant an infant, you know, at a minimum of 12 vaccines. And the government was actually recommending six days and not making it clear to parents which were mandated and which words of course, most of them are getting 16 because they’re recommended, you know, and again, that’s misleading and false and misleading information and, and they’re causing serious ill health and chronic illness and deaths in the population. And again, that’s a problem. That’s a problem. journalists to be providing false and misleading information in the media, and

Molly Knight 56:05
that they should be held accountable.

Dr Judy Wilyman 56:08
That’s right, that they’ve reversed all of the arguments and suppressed and sense of the academic literature of myself and many others. And, you know, when that is when you debate on these forums, like the conversation website, we get ridiculed and abused as if it was Facebook. And even though they claim that it’s an academic forum where you can present your information and that they have strict rules of conduct, they with with with this topic, they allow the the abuse and ridicule and once your reputation smeared, many professionals won’t speak up because they see what’s happened to other people. Yes. And it’s a form of violence as well. You know, it’s very difficult to continue doing it. So of course, then you do silence the opposition. Then you can claim Oh, look, we’ve got a consensus on the science. And that’s all that the public sees, because we’ve been completely abused. And, you know, it’s it’s hard in relationships because parents that people are getting your friends are getting false and misleading information and we’re being stigmatized as anti vaxxers. You know, it’s really quite, quite violence, it is a violence and people need to wake up to what sort of, is this a civilized society? Have we gone back to the medieval days where, you know, are we happy to have this division and people, instead of being allowed to debate different opinions, we’ve got groupthink due to bullying, you know, coming through the media, the media is driving in the medical industry through political avenues as well. And, you know, the politicians wouldn’t even look at the evidence I was providing from the university because Cause, you know, the medical lobby groups are so successful in, you know, making allegations of misconduct and then presenting them to the politicians, whatever, but also using Wikipedia. Wikipedia actually locks out individuals on these topics and we can’t change the information that’s up there. And there’s a lot of lies and and false information. And then you know, you have to live with it, even though you know that you’ve acted with integrity. And your only concern is the health of children and the population. What what other motive would I have, there’s, there’s no money involved in this, you lose your reputation. You know, I just hope that people are waking up listening now to what is happening in this country. And thankfully, we have one or two lawyers with integrity that is brought up to support us. And you know, there’s so much money involved in this that it’s keeping other lawyers the government pays many law firms. And they will lose that funding if they jump on this this issue. And the same with doctors. But, you know, I’d like to appeal to all doctors, nurses, police, everybody, the integrity needs to come back into institutions. And there is no future for our children. If this doesn’t happen, and so now would be a good time for people to come together in those professions and stand up together with the public. Yes, because, you know, there’s no science in locking up healthy people in quarantining people in hotels, you know, medically testing healthy people. Is that is that the country we want to live in? Because that will be the new norm. If professionals don’t come together now and challenge the government with this lack of science?

Molly Knight 59:51
Yes, actually, a friend from America was telling me that they’ve had over 300,000 cases of carbon dioxide poisoning from people wearing these masks for long periods of time, that it’s making them sick.

Dr Judy Wilyman 1:00:08
It absolutely is making them sick. And it’s very clear from the scientific studies that have been done, how and why that happens. But the other thing too is when the media doesn’t report on these things, that it matters will not happen. You know, that’s the reality that media creates. And, you know, that’s what we’re getting here in Australia, and media that is hiding the suicide rates, the anxiety and depression about elderly people that are dying alone in, you know, aged care facilities because of this stupid rule. That disgraceful. They need to be segregated from the public, and that we have to have a vaccine to actually go and visit them and there’s no evidence to support that policy whatsoever. The scientific evidence doesn’t exist. We’ve asked for it. You know, if it existed, you know, we would debated, but and but there’s no evidence to say that using a flu vaccine prevents people from getting the flu or in fact, is related to, in fact, the science there’s many articles suggesting that if you have the flu vaccine, it makes you more susceptible to Coronavirus is when you’re in if you get infected, huh, yes. Serious? Yes. And the a lot of evidence like that. And so, you know, the government has just been doing what it’s like with without any accountability, because the media keeps keeps quiet on all of these issues. Yes,

Molly Knight 1:01:38
yes, we were in a terrible situation, really. And we’ve got to wake up and stand up and stand together to make change because we need change.

Dr Judy Wilyman 1:01:49
We do and proof of causality is the key. Now I will point out that with COVID, the first cases that weren’t observed in China started around late December. And China mandated the flu vaccine for the first time in December 2019, as did Italy, and many European countries, Canada and Australia without aged care facilities. So for the first time ever, countries have mandated the flu vaccine. And lo and behold, the first and second waves of COVID occurred two or three weeks after the vaccine campaigns occurred in the aged care facilities. Now we want evidence based medicine and the PCR tests the antibody tests and not identifying that particular size Cove to virus they do not have high specificity for that virus, and they’re not licensed diagnostic tools. So we also want that correlation It is quite possible that the neurological damage that is being caused is caused by the vaccines. There’s strong evidence because flu vaccines in aged care facilities in past years have caused a cluster of deaths and illnesses after the campaigns. And the current report on it doesn’t happen. And so we need that correlation investigated as well to prove or disprove whether the flu vaccine has caused most of these Koba deaths because the fact is that the majority have occurred in elderly people over the age of 80. And they all have had co-morbidities, they’re not dying, just from a virus. They’ve all had comorbidities that in previous years would have been listed as the cause of death, you know, cancer, or lung disease or pneumonia, you know, strokes. All of those things are being pushed aside to label at COVID just on a suspected diet. nosis and no proof from any licensed diagnostic test. And so we mustn’t let the government get away with this.

Molly Knight 1:04:08
Yes, agree. quite agree.

Dr Judy Wilyman 1:04:10
Yeah. And because our media won’t publicize it and assistant See, normally you have a media to make the government accountable for these policies. But we haven’t had that for over a decade. And I’ve experienced the strategies that have been used to prevent us having that voice and making our government accountable. And that goes for the family court system as well. The bias and corruption in the family court system I have experienced in attempting to because now we have so many parents who are fighting each other over the vaccination issue. Yes, yes, sir. Then they don’t want to vaccinate and the other one won’t look at anything. If it hasn’t come from the government or the you know, the doctor. And so therefore, we have a lot of anxiety depression in parents now having children and they’re ending up in the court. This is very divisive. Australia is not a pleasant place to be having children at this point in time. And you know, this issue, this was never an issue pre, you know, the 19th?

Molly Knight 1:05:11
Yes, it’s a very sad state, isn’t it?

Dr Judy Wilyman 1:05:14
That’s right. And we were never at risk from these diseases after 1950 no serious risk to the majority of people, the asymptomatic cases, in the majority of cases, you know, in a developed country, 99% of these cases will be asymptomatic or mild, and that goes for the COVID virus as well.

Molly Knight 1:05:36
And in fact, you would, I would have thought the government would want herd immunity to an unknown virus. So isolating people and wearing masks is exactly the opposite. To get some herd immunity. That’s very

Dr Judy Wilyman 1:05:54
strange decisions, no goes right. You know, and that’s where we need to ask why In the first place right at the very, very beginning, why was the government thinking simply out of after one month of cases of this new coronavirus being observed? Why was it thinking global pandemic? And let’s let’s look at how they call the global pandemic one we have talked about the change in definition, yes to, they then needed large numbers of deaths and illnesses. So a mathematical formula was used, and it had false assumptions in that formula. And that was after a few of us pointed that out because you seem he can’t use generic assumptions for every country in the world to to decide how a virus will behave in each country. He says I mentioned the different environmental conditions host characteristics, genes, constitution and quality of health care system. But so that’s how they produce this enormous exaggerated numbers of deaths that would happen if this virus entered the country. Hence, they use that to lock down healthy populations now. It’s again, flawed of all flawed, and you don’t locked down half population, the first thing you need to do is experience that virus in the country to see if it’s going to be a problem, in our circumstances, our specific environmental and hosted consensus, and we have a wonderful health care system, you know, so none of that happened. And as you said, the directives that were brought in are all the opposite to how you would promote health anyway, everything will make us more unhealthy. Exactly, you know, and you can’t say that’s an unintended consequence. You know, the medical health literature has been promoting ways of health promotion for decades. You know, in the medical literature, that’s what we’ve been using for decades. So it wasn’t done intended to help consequences. We know that you isolate the sick people. We know you don’t lock up healthy people in stuffy rooms and give them poor nutrition and not let them go out for exercise for two weeks. You know that is criminal intent using fraudulent tests and unlicensed diagnostic tests and that needs to be made accountable.

Molly Knight 1:08:21
Yes, absolutely. The government’s have got a lot to answer for. And individually, they need to be held accountable.

Dr Judy Wilyman 1:08:30
Absolutely. And when anyone’s not aware, I mean serene for her. And she sent out the class action to end the legal action that she was taking against all the state premiers if they didn’t remove directives, such as the mandatory flu vaccine, and many other directives that have removed freedom of rights without scientific evidence, and the borders as well as the borders need to be opened. There’s no reason to have those borders closed and You sent that letter out on the 20th of August. And the premiers were required to take action by the 27th of August. And if they didn’t, then legal action was starting. So I don’t think the media has publicized that fact. And I think it’s important that the public knows that lawyers are picking this up, and that the fraudulent reporting on cases and deaths of this disease is a critical point. And premiers can be made liable under civil rights and in the courts for personally liable for the fact that the figures and statistics have not been properly reported. Yeah.

Molly Knight 1:09:43
So I would just make a suggestion that as many people as possible go to serines pay page webpage advocate. advocate me it, isn’t it? Yeah. And join her soon join her in her civil action needs to support Let’s jump on board everyone go to her page. Yes.

Dr Judy Wilyman 1:10:05
And people need to know that closing a border and putting the military on it is not keeping out of ours. And certainly there is no need for the military to be there now the borders need to be opened and business as normal, and the herd immunity in the population builds naturally to any new mutated coronavirus. This virus has been downgraded. It is not transmitting any more quickly than other influenza viruses. And the overall mortality rate is no different to other flu years. We know in some countries, it’s been a strong flu season in other countries a mild flu season but we are not experienced any greater number of deaths this year to other previous years.

Molly Knight 1:10:48
Yeah, exactly. It’s pretty well standard how it is every year, isn’t it? We have some countries worse and others. Yeah,

Dr Judy Wilyman 1:10:54
that’s right.

Molly Knight 1:10:55
And if you look at some of the stats you notice that have diseases

Dr Judy Wilyman 1:11:01
That’s it. That’s

mine. Yeah. Yeah,

Molly Knight 1:11:06
influence data.

Dr Judy Wilyman 1:11:08
So So what’s happened is, you know that, you know, they’ve reported on deaths that happen every year. Normally they’re all these deaths they’ve reported on them. And even on suspected cases, they’ve labeled at COVID as a, as opposed to the comorbidity that was that they were living with prior to the death. And they haven’t reported on whether those deaths were vaccinated cases or unvaccinated. So that’s information that we should know about how many of these have the flu vaccine, and you know, exactly a range of things.

Molly Knight 1:11:38
Yes. An interesting fact that I’ve often thought about is I think it was last year was the first year here in Australia that they had a special vaccine. I flew back for the elderly, so anyone over 65 had an extra strain, very special. And it’s interesting that there are so many elderly deaths with He’s cozy, right? Yeah,

Dr Judy Wilyman 1:12:02
yeah. Is there a correlation? well understand the second wave happened, you know, two or three weeks after we mandated that vaccine for all visitors. And, of course, the Aged Care residents, they most of them accepted anyway, because they’ve been indoctrinated to say that it’s beneficial. And so it was only the health care workers and the visitors that they needed to mandate it for. But you know, that correlation is significant. And proof of causality is the key to this entire health situation. And if they want to claim they’re using medical, sorry, evidence based medicine again, they need to look at all correlations and possible causes of the deaths.

Molly Knight 1:12:49
Yes, exactly. Yeah, exactly. Wow. Okay. Let’s have a couple of questions, Judy. Just let me read these. Okay, there’s a few Do you think they can make it mandatory? So, this is obviously the COVID vaccine. Amy is asking do you think they can actually make it mandatory,

Dr Judy Wilyman 1:13:11
not have the people object and rise up and resist, you know, this, you know, this is our bodies, it saves our children’s future and freedom, we need to stand up and and not allow them to do this. So if we stand up a mess, people power can change that situation. And, you know, I think a lot more people are waking up to the fact that vaccines have not been proven to be safe and effective. And the very fact that they rolling this out in you know, nine months, you know, nine months and they started manufacturing and only a month after then the novel coronavirus was discovered, you know, the plan damage is clearly a pandemic Many people are now aware that population control is part of the agenda. And, you know, there’s all sorts of talk of nanoparticles being present in a possible vaccine, which will enable people to be scanned and, you know, to determine if they’re vaccinated or unvaccinated and of course, the immunity passes have been talking about so that we won’t so coercive vaccination. And, you know, I think many, many more people now are aware that mandatory vaccine is a crime against humanity. Absolutely, yes. Because it means our individual James, you know, it should never have passed in the no job, no pay or play and we want that repealed. And we will fight to ensure that this is repealed for our children’s health, the sake of our children, and a free future for all of us. So, no, it can’t happen if we keep talking and waking up the population and showing that the evidence does doesn’t exist for any mandatory vaccination. You’re quite different to choosing whether you want to use a vaccine. We’re talking mandatory vaccine and corrosive vaccination. There’s no justification for that whatsoever.

Molly Knight 1:15:12
Yes, great. And if people want to take the vaccine if they that brave, then go for it.

Dr Judy Wilyman 1:15:18
Yeah, exactly. nobody’s taking away anyone’s right to use the vaccine. But the key here is that it’s a different argument to talk about mandatory and coercive vaccination. And it is an experiment on the population when you’re bringing something in, you know, fast tracking a medical intervention without the long term health safety effects of that vaccine, and all vaccines do cause neurological damage. Let me just point out that the swine flu vaccine used in 1976 and in 2009, caused narcolepsy and other neurological damage That was proven and compensation cases were put through in Sweden. In the US in the 1976, swine flu. Suppose that pandemic, they vaccinated, you know, 10s of thousands of people and many of them got Guillain Barre syndrome, cerebral palsy, these seizures, convulsions, that’s all documented, yet we’re repeating history. And it is now time for the public to start talking about this issue and making sure we’ve got a media that will actually represent the public’s voice. This has to be changed.

Molly Knight 1:16:38
Yes, absolutely. And I think there’s quite a few cases around the world is Italy, India, the Philippines and South Africa. I think that assuming you’re GAVI, I guess, and Bill Gates and his polio vaccine for all the damage and deaths.

Dr Judy Wilyman 1:16:59
That’s Right, I heard I heard a German lawyer speaking today. And he actually gave a speech on the 29th of August with Robert Kennedy at the the Berlin, huge protests and marches that they had there. And yes, he said that they’re starting litigation in the Civil Rights courts. They will be a personal liability for governors in the US and of course, premiers here in Australia, and other public politicians figures who have, you know, used the fraudulent PCR tests and antibody tests to repeat port cases of COVID when in fact they’re not allies license diagnostic tool. So yes, litigation in Germany, California, and other areas of the US has already started on that the fraudulent reporting of cases.

Molly Knight 1:17:55
Yeah. Which is so true. So it’s your

Dr Judy Wilyman 1:17:58
that’s driving your car. It has actually come out and admitted that they had over. They had labeled many thousands of cases as COVID that weren’t close cases. So they’ve actually admitted that they their statistics were inflated, wrongly, and on top of the fact that the PCR test is not a licensed diagnostic tool.

Molly Knight 1:18:21
Yes, exactly. What um, hang on. Sorry. I’m just looking at a message here. It’s about the PCR test. What are the specifics associated with it? What, what makes it some not a valid test?

Dr Judy Wilyman 1:18:40
Okay, so the PCR test is a test that normally identifies DNA sequences of DNA in the genomes of viruses. In this case, it’s a bit we’re looking at RNA, the corona viruses and RNA virus. And for this for the PCR test to even identify the segments, it’s got to magnify it thousands of times. And then it’s only identifying segments of the virus. So unless you have a whole it unless you’ve got a test that can isolate the whole virus to prove that that particular virus was present causing that disease, then you haven’t proved causality. And all they’ve done there is just identify segments of RNA that are similar to, you know, the source code to RNA, but it’s not the whole virus. And so that doesn’t prove causality. And also, the test isn’t standardized across states, countries, whatever. So the number of times you magnify it determines, you know, whether you’ll get a positive or a negative result. If you don’t, if you’re not using a standard number of magnifications. Then you know, the finger in you know, maybe on the east is Different to a positive result on the east might have been a negative result over here, you know, so they’re not standardizing the test either. And different crazy good or positive results if they magnify and, you know, do a greater magnification. Mm hmm.

Molly Knight 1:20:16
Well, you know, for me, I think if there’s lots of positive cases, and they’re not seek, that’s a great thing, because you can say, well, there’s some herd immunity beginning but they never mentioned any of that do that.

Dr Judy Wilyman 1:20:28
No, no, and it’s best that Healthy People do not get medically tested that is not something we want to live with it it’s an infringement of our right to live naturally in society. That’s our bodies. There should be no medically testing of healthy people. Yeah. You only get tested if you’ve got symptoms of a disease that you believe could be serious that’s that’s quite different. And you know the the effect of this you know, taking temperature by shooting a gun at the A laser beam that can go to near the pineal gland. And, you know, do we want that as the new norm when it’s unnecessary and unscientific and possibly a risk to the hormonal balance of the body? You know, who’s who’s investigated that, you know, they brought this in without any sort of assessment of what damage they’re actually causing by doing and, you know, on top of the fact that it’s a removal of our human right, you know, to participate in society without being tested. You know, and I feel for the children in schools actually, at the moment as well.

Molly Knight 1:21:37
Then what’s happening in wi Judy? That’s, yes, very scary. I think

Dr Judy Wilyman 1:21:42
it’s very scary because a school should not be a place for medical testing, or for any experiments to be going on with children, you know, but apparently they’re doing a clinical trial here in Wi Fi, ran by the telethon Institute for children’s health and Nurses are going into the schools and taking cheek swabs from the children. You know, so they come in masks, you know, with their masks on and gloves and take a cheek swab, but I’m not sure the purpose of a cheek swab because that’s not a PCR test. So it’s not related to COVID. I have heard that there’s a clause in the contract that the government has with the Chinese company that they bought the PCR tests from. And there’s a clause that says that the DNA genome can be retained by both the Australian Government and the Chinese government. So that clause apparently exists in our contract. So is this a case of collecting DNA? What is it the sounds like it of nurses going into the schools and collecting cheek swabs from children and why are schools being used Just medical testing grounds in the first place. And vaccines in schools is a step too far. You know, individuals need individual advice as to whether they should get a vaccine or not. But all of that went out the door. And without discussion and debate, the pharmaceutical companies have literally made these policies throughout governments and they’ve reduced the age of children to 14 so that now a 14 year olds can get a vaccine without telling their parents they can get other medical treatments without telling their parents because that I it was reduced to 14 but a child 14 cannot assess the literature. And parents are their legal guardian. We have a duty to look after the health of our children but who consulted us on reducing the age of children to 14

Molly Knight 1:23:53
Yes, absolutely. That’s

Dr Judy Wilyman 1:23:55
areas 18 a child is under 18. You know, and he 16 might have been more sensible, but, you know, 14? No, no, it’s been removed as a democracy in Australia and it hasn’t been 14 years.

Molly Knight 1:24:14
Yeah, we definitely have to make some changes and

Dr Judy Wilyman 1:24:16
now that’s it.

Molly Knight 1:24:18
Okay, another question. Someone Masha has said, Have you forwarded your thesis to ministers around Australia to read? They probably won’t read it.

Dr Judy Wilyman 1:24:33
I spent many years I spent a decade writing to politicians writing to the Human Rights Commission, writing to the health department and the chief medical officers. I put in submissions for the no job no pay inquiry, Senate inquiry. I put in submissions to the Human Rights Commission emit Amendment Bill for discrimination In policy, and all of my submissions were ignored. And, in fact, for the Senate inquiry for the no job, no pay, thousands of people put in submissions, and the majority of them were against the no job, no pay, but they were all ignored. So it’s not just the academic information that I have been providing and all the letters I’ve had so many standard letters have replied, vaccines are safe and effective. And, you know, and and they’ve been tested for 10 years. We, we strongly support the government vaccination program, because it’s for community health, you know, and everybody’s getting them but they never answer the questions, the specific questions we ask. And when I sent letters to the Human Rights Commission, they would pass it on to the health department, you know, so nobody is answering the questions. Our Human Rights Commission is actually toothless with respect to him. Human Rights and particularly medical freedom. That wasn’t even on the agenda for the conversation last year. She

Molly Knight 1:26:08
Okay, we need change your lanta has asked Would you please comment on the use of ventilators as compared with respirators with the COVID patients?

Dr Judy Wilyman 1:26:20
were like, I can’t really do that because I’m not a medical doctor. And what I know was with COVID, and just through listening to nurses and doctors speak, is that the ventilators were being misused, that they that a ventilator is something that an elderly patient is put on to prolong their life when they know there’s no other options. And it’s just to prolong life for a little bit longer. Most people die once they’ve been put on a ventilator. So now being misused for the COVID outbreak. I also know that there was incentives Doctors to use the ventilators.

Molly Knight 1:27:04
And installous wasn’t the right

Dr Judy Wilyman 1:27:06
and incentives also to label a patient as covid, even without any clinical or laboratory evidence, all of that was incentivized, as has been the doctors with regard to vaccination that they were getting paid per person that they vaccinated or Yeah, and medical centers get paid to raise the immunization rates of under four year olds, they get a lump sum from pharmaceutical companies. So there’s your financial rewards are being used to misuse a lot of the the ventilators and, and other protocols in the hospitals. That was another way in which deaths happened prematurely. They reversed a lot of the protocols that normally happen, and, you know, it caused more harm than than benefit and

yeah, that’s where a lot of illness and deaths came from as well.

Molly Knight 1:28:01
What can you say? What can you say? Yeah, it is. It’s unbelievable. And you know that these people who accept all the bribes, the money, these are human beings, you know, where is their integrity?

Dr Judy Wilyman 1:28:17
Well, that’s where I’m appealing to them now because, you know, I did understand, you know, previously they’re in a rough between a rock and a hard place. Until enough people stand up together, then they the doctors certainly weren’t gagged in being able to present you know, their knowledge of the academic literature and the risks of vaccines. However, you know, we’ve got serene doing a class action against the Australian health practitioners regulatory authority to ensure that doctors are able to speak openly about their own assessment of the medical literature. And, you know, it’s very clear in health promotion in order to promote Health. People need autonomy over their own bodies. Yes, autonomy is removed, health declines, it is a health promotion and needs autonomy over our bodies. And it certainly needs a medical profession that has autonomy to assist the medical interpreter for themselves. Yeah, they’re the doctors, not the regulatory authority. Exactly, yes. And then the medical industry or pharmaceutical companies that are influencing their education. You see, we want the doctors there the either, you know, and people with the knowledge to be able to assist medical literature and they need to be able to speak openly. And that’s how we’ve arrived at this medical tyranny. Yes, regulation of doctors and their gagging of or removal of their autonomy

Molly Knight 1:29:52
to Yeah, it is and also just slightly different topic, but the hydroxychloroquine If the GP now prescribes it, the pharmacy, the pharmacy, pharmacists can override the doctor’s prescription and the pharmacist can say no.

Dr Judy Wilyman 1:30:12
Well, how can that?

Yep. And again, if they did that, you know, that would be a crime, because they’re 70 years of evidence saying that the hydroxychloroquine is a good for COVID and flu like illness such as COVID. And so clearly, they need to be careful about overriding that because that could be considered a criminal offence and they could be held liable for withholding and known cure for a disease. And they know we’re getting into pretty interesting territory when they spin this, you know, the TGA perhaps could be, you know, held responsible or made accountable to for putting in that directory. Yes, exactly. withholding treatments.

Molly Knight 1:31:03
Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. It’s insane. It’s insane. Yeah, it is. It is. Now another one. Virginia has asked, Is there a way we can get the stuff out from the child system? Now? I’m assuming she’s maintaining the chemicals or the additives in vaccines?

Dr Judy Wilyman 1:31:24
Yes. Right. Well, I know that a lot. A lot of holistic doctors use chelation and other methods to try and detoxify the body. So definitely, yes. You know, go to your holistic doctors and try and do that. But remember, if you choose to use a vaccine, you know, it does contain chemicals and foreign DNA, and that can affect your quality of life. Once your quality of life is gone, it is much harder to get it back so it doesn’t require you know, a proper investigation. of what you’re going to do with your child’s body and your own body. And, you know, I think too many people are just blindly following what the government is saying, and not making an effort to investigate for themselves and decide the risks and benefit of so many vaccines. Well, they’re not

Molly Knight 1:32:19
educated to do that there. It’s the opposite, you know, is

Dr Judy Wilyman 1:32:23
the indoctrination through the school system. And I mean, even celebrities and comedians, they’ve been incentivized to actually promote vaccines, when you must have noticed how all the comedians in Australia have taught at some point how to guard anti vaxxers Yes, comedian knows anything about science and, you know, the benefits or risks of a vaccine. And yet, they’re happy to make anti vaxxers the butt of their jokes and I’ve seen every one of them do it, you know, of course, because I turned to comedy to try and, you know, keep my sanity. And of course,

Unknown Speaker 1:33:01
not healthy. It was,

Dr Judy Wilyman 1:33:03
you know, I find it very interesting that, that they’ve got children as well. And it’s the one political issue where, you know, you’re allowed to abuse and ridicule people, even academics and professionals that speak up, you know, you’re actually encouraged to do it and probably incentivized, obviously, yes. But can we just get people to start thinking about this? You know, why is it a political issue that you can bully people into believing? And until we get people to start thinking for themselves? And this means that celebrities and comedians now have to act with integrity as well. Because they need to start thinking about their own kids future and what what they want for them and you know, we all live in this world together and do they like bullying and ridiculing and is that how they want their children to be treated in the playground? I know many Parents who have educated their children on vaccines, and these children are getting bullied in the playground, and they’re getting bullied by teachers in the classroom. Teachers are actually singling them out and saying, oh, you’re an unvaccinated child and making them feel bad. And and, you know, that is very, very damaging. And, and it’s a very divisive society that, you know, I it’s interesting that people are so happy to accept that. Um, yeah,

Molly Knight 1:34:28
yeah, you’re right. It’s, it’s quite tragic,

Dr Judy Wilyman 1:34:32
actually, that we’ve got this far down the road. So, you know, we really do have to, to wake people up quickly. And everybody needs to keep talking about this, you know, to their friends and trying to introduce it in a way that will open their minds because I know the government’s used psychological strategies to close people’s minds, the cognitive dissonance, is that a Paik? Absolutely, yeah, with the media control that we have It has been very difficult to talk to anyone on this issue.

Molly Knight 1:35:05
Yeah, I agree. But I think I have faith because if you look at the people are definitely waking up and questioning things. And you think about all these people speaking out about the the dangers or the dis the non disclosure of truth around vaccines, it’s all medical professionals. It’s not Joe Blow, who you know, just does the garden twice a week. These are medical professionals, you are questioning the the efficacy and the safety of this instrument that we are, well, I think being forced onto us through coercion,

Dr Judy Wilyman 1:35:53
or dishonesty. That is it is and you know, I think it was always going to take an event like COVID To help us expose the lies that the government has been selling this program on for decades, and yeah, school curriculums, and, you know, even the University of Wollongong and they used a strategy once my PhD was approved, and as soon as it was published on the University website, they ensured that 60 academics from the faculty of science, medicine and health, were required to sign their names to a statement on the university’s website, saying that they support the government’s vaccination program. Now, not a single one of those academics had even read my thesis or investigated vaccines for themselves. So they’ve never investigated the government’s claims of safety and efficacy, yet they signed their name to that statement. And that in itself, you know, was difficult for me, but that shows up breach of academic integrity by the university. Yes. And so what was the point of doing a PhD investigating the schedule when none of them debated or read my thesis and all of them blindly signed their names to that, that support for government vaccination policy. And, and that is deceptive to the public. So deceptive.

Molly Knight 1:37:25
Yeah, very deceptive. We have been deceived in many, many things over the last 20 or 30. What 3040 years really is. I think it’s been a very clever plan to get us to a position where we have little freedom. Well, no freedoms, almost little choice and we just have to bow down

Dr Judy Wilyman 1:37:48
and I won’t know what this is.

You know, we’ve lost many pips. So many people now have lost so much. We’ve lost our sense of community We have nothing left to lose. And that’s why I say to everybody to start thinking about in their profession, are they acting with integrity? And yeah, is this the Australia you want to live with? Are these the new norms that you think are acceptable for your children? We’ve had freedom and there’s no reason to remove our personal autonomy over our own bodies. And, you know, all these facial recognition cameras that are coming in with the five G. You know, there’s an agenda of population control that I think, you know, people like to present it perhaps as a conspiracy theory, but you’ve got to look at the evidence. The evidence is there. The 5g is going up, the facial recognition cameras are going in. The politicians are talking about community. immunity passes cozy passes in a vaccination certificate so you can participate in society. They’ve got the military on the borders, look at the evidence, we have got nothing left to lose. And so don’t be fearful to stand up. Just, you know, what sort of future Do you want for your children? And what do you want integrity in the institutions because we need to bring back integrity in many of these institutions. So now is the time to stand together to do this. Hmm, we cannot be fearful. Absolutely. I think as soon as you allow that temperature check or medical test of a healthy person, then you have complied. And they will continue doing this until we resist.

Molly Knight 1:39:43
Yes, yes. Time to say no.

Dr Judy Wilyman 1:39:46
Absolutely. And all borders need to be open. There is no reason to have those borders closed. Now.

Molly Knight 1:39:52
It’s quite ridiculous when you think about it. Um, you know, viruses float in the air for goodness sakes. They don’t This is the border. Thank you.

Dr Judy Wilyman 1:40:02
Well, this is it.

They did. Viruses are not living things. And the other thing people need to remember is that just because you’re exposed to a virus, doesn’t mean you’re going to get sick or disease. The virus can only cause disease if certain environmental factors, as I’ve said, are present or certain host characteristics are present. And the virus will cause maybe asymptomatic infection in many people, pseudo and mild infection in some people, and very rarely in a developed country, would you get serious illness from one of these from the virus? You know, this virus is not any more serious than a normal influenza virus. So this is why the borders need to be opened. The reporting has been fraudulent, and people have been misinformed as to how viruses cause disease. I’d like to just If I could raid one of the things that I came across in my research, which really should help emphasize the fact that a virus on its own does not cause disease, at least 99% of people will get an asymptomatic or mild infection from that virus. And in 1960 Frank but Frank MacFarlane, Burnett received the Nobel Prize for immunology in Australia. He stated that genetics, nutrition, psychological and environmental factors may play a more important role in resistance to disease than the assumed benefits of artificial immunity induced by vaccination. He considered the genetic deterioration of the population may be a consequence of universal mass vaccination. And in 1960s are only using two vaccines, three vaccines at that point? Yes, we postulate Did that in the long term vaccination may be against the best interests of the state? Well, that’s what we’ve observed, the genetic fabric of the population is deteriorating, we have seen chronic illness skyrocket in children tenfold in direct dose response relationship to the vaccination program. So here is a Nobel Prize Laureate from 1960 predicting this situation. And we have a government that has refused to investigate this direct correlation between the expansion of the schedule and all the illness that we’re seeing in the population. You know, this illness is a serious long term chronic illness that many people will not live the potential that they were born with. And apparently the long term cares and I’ll say their children died before them. It is time to have this debate, and millions of people have autistic children and that evidence has not been investigated.

Molly Knight 1:43:02
Yes, yes, it’s time that we make some change make it happen, because the government’s the current governments aren’t going to look at any of this. They too. They’re corrupt. Sorry, but they just corrupt

Dr Judy Wilyman 1:43:14
What? I have experienced some of that corruption. It’s very sad. And now we are at a point where we’re losing our freedoms over this. And I think, yeah, the lawyers do need to pick this up, and we need to support them and make sure that there’s accountability for these decisions that are so blatantly against health promotion of the community.

Molly Knight 1:43:40
Yeah, yeah, quite agree. So, certainly, let me encourage everyone again, go to serines web page advocate me and join her her suits join her class actions. Let’s support the work that is being done so that we can step by step Go in the right direction and get our freedoms back. Get our lives back.

Dr Judy Wilyman 1:44:05
That’s wrong. Yeah, absolutely.

Molly Knight 1:44:09
Okay, on that note to the mob was talk, thank you so much I value your knowledge and your courage because it does take courage to step up and step out of the the norm and you do get attacked. I know.

Dr Judy Wilyman 1:44:26
Yes, yeah, I won’t deny that. But you do have to have courage and just know that, you know, you’ve acted with integrity, and that, you know, if a medical procedure works, then educated people will be using it without being coerced or forced into that medication. Point. You do not need coercive medical practices. If the procedure works, it will speak for itself. Yes. And so this is where we really critically need investigation of the chronic illness in the population and whether you know, whether it is linked to this expanded vaccination program, which is the most likely cause because of the chemicals that we know are in it, and the foreign DNA that is in those vaccines. Yeah,

Molly Knight 1:45:16
quite scary what they put into some of these vaccinations as it is, yeah,

Dr Judy Wilyman 1:45:21
that’s what polysorbate 80 causes infertility and sodium borides. And you know, they’re in the Gardasil vaccine. That was one of the first things that I questioned, you know, and the TGA. And the understanding didn’t provide an answer. Just the standard vaccines are safe and effective and have been tested for 10 years. Well, at least the public can see now that they’re not tested for 10 years.

Molly Knight 1:45:44
Exactly. Yeah.

Dr Judy Wilyman 1:45:45
And we have not been identified.

Molly Knight 1:45:48
Yeah, yeah. There’s a lot to be thankful for with this. cosy. Absolutely, because it’s opened a lot of eyes. Definitely. Yeah, hopefully

Dr Judy Wilyman 1:45:56
a lot more very rapidly.

Molly Knight 1:45:59
Yes, exactly. Exactly, yeah. All right. Well, I think that’s it, Julia. Unless you’ve got anything else. Well, I know you’ve got a lot more that you could add. But maybe another another night, we could talk a little deeper about vaccines and what’s actually in them, and the likely effects that it is having.

Dr Judy Wilyman 1:46:20
Thank you. Thanks, Molly. That’s it.

Molly Knight 1:46:23
Yeah, very much. Appreciate you.

Dr Judy Wilyman 1:46:26
Thanks. Thank you. Yeah. Good night. Great. Thanks.

Molly Knight 1:46:29
Good night, everyone. Thanks for joining us. Thanks for staying with us tonight. It’s been a long talk. But it’s been an enormously valuable talk and Judy is very courageous because anyone who talks about the vaccine debate or the vaccine, yay or nay always gets a little bit of tact and I’ve had a few scathing moments in my lifetime in practice, but I always believe that what is there is You want to do it, you should have the freedom to actually do it, whether it’s something into your body or onto your body, whether you go to a movie or out for dinner, if you want to do it, we have freedom, or we did. We did, but they’ve been slowly eroded. So we need to all stand up together, to fight back and take back our human rights. So please join serene advocate me, jump on board with her litigation that she’s doing and become part of a group that makes really good change for the benefit of humanity. Because that’s what’s being threatened at the moment. Make no mistake, that’s what’s being threatened here. Okay, so good night, everybody. God bless. Thank you for staying with us. And I hope that you have gained as much from this talk as I have good night.


Jenny Johnston interview
Have these unprecedented times taken a toll on your mental health? Jenny Johnston, hypnotherapist and EFT practitioner joined us Thursday September 10th to discuss how EFT can support you in managing anxiety, pain, depression and fear.
In her live discussion with Molly Knight, Jenny discussed and demonstrated:
  • The beginnings of EFT Emotional Freedom Technique
  • How EFT can help anxiety, panic, depression, fear, anger



Jenny completed her Bachelor of Applied Science in Occupational Therapy in 1980. While working with outpatients suffering from severe anxiety disorders, she became aware of the amazing healing powers of relaxation therapy. She went on to gain qualifications in hypnotherapy, counselling, conflict resolution, Emotional Freedom Techniques (EFT) and Intuitive Energy Psychology (IEP). Melbourne based, Jenny endeavours to inspire, touch and move people so they can become whatever they desire and see the possibilities that are available to them when they remove what holds them back. She is a keynote speaker and author and enjoys Certifying Practitioners from around the world in both EFT and Quantum EFT. Read more about Jenny here:

Click on the image below to view the complete interview:



The complete transcript is presented below (E&OE) :


Listen to episode 13 of the podcast below:


Anita Bentata, soul centred psychotherapist and counsellor joined us on Thursday 27th August via Facebook Live to discuss how you can shift overwhelm, confusion and emotional pain. In her live discussion with Molly Knight, Anita covered:
  • Dealing with rage and helplessness.
  • Using your whole brain (not just parts) to keep you on track
  • Two human habits that are holding you back and how you can easily change this
  • Staying free from trauma no matter the external controls
  • How to move away from drama and be part of the solution


Anita Bentata is a Melbourne based, mind body psychotherapist & health coach​ with a special interest in helping individuals navigate their way through trauma and abuse. She completed a Bachelor of Human Services (Monash University), specialising in Human Behaviour before qualifying as a soul centred psychotherapist and counsellor. Anita went on to do further training as a Certified Integrative Health Coach (Institute of Integrative Nutrition), and later as a Restorative Exercise Specialist ™ at the Nutritious Movement Institute. She is also an​ international multi​-award​ winner, author and speaker.


Click on the image below to view the complete interview:

The transcript from our automated service follows. (E&OE) HAP200827transcript

Listen to episode 11 of our HAP News podcast below: